Umidigi A15C vs Xiaomi Poco M5s: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Shoppers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco M5s is the better buy. While the Umidigi A15C’s Unisoc T606 is a modern chip, the Poco M5s’ Helio G95 provides a noticeable performance uplift, coupled with significantly faster 33W charging – a crucial advantage for daily usability. The brighter display is also a key benefit.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi A15C | Xiaomi Poco M5s |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2022, September 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023 | Available. Released 2022, September 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.6 x 75.3 x 8.6 mm (6.60 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 160.5 x 74.5 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 178.8 g (6.31 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits | AMOLED, 450 nits (typ), 700 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 64% in 30 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Black, Jade Green, Lavender Purple, Pearl White, Space Gray | Gray, Blue, White |
| Models | - | 2207117BPG |
| Price | - | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 132h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 360681 (v9) GeekBench: 1831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi A15C
- Potentially lower price point
- Modern Unisoc T606 chipset
- Functional for basic tasks
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely lower display brightness
- Inferior performance compared to Poco M5s
Xiaomi Poco M5s
- Faster Helio G95 processor
- Significantly faster 33W charging
- Brighter 756 nit display
- May be slightly more expensive
- Endurance rating is the same as A15C
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco M5s boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 756 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Umidigi A15C. This makes the Poco M5s far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the higher peak brightness of the Poco M5s is the defining factor. Bezels and panel technology (LCD vs IPS) are not specified for the A15C, suggesting a more basic display experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for both. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning of the Poco M5s suggests a more refined camera experience, potentially with better image processing algorithms. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on many phones in this price range is often a marketing gimmick and unlikely to provide significant photographic value on either device.
Performance
The Poco M5s’ MediaTek Helio G95 chipset, with its 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, demonstrably outperforms the Umidigi A15C’s Unisoc T606 (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). The Cortex-A76 cores in the G95 offer a substantial architectural advantage over the A75 cores in the T606, resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. While both are 12nm chips, the G95 is optimized for gaming. The Poco M5s is likely to handle demanding games with higher frame rates and fewer stutters.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 132 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the Poco M5s’ 33W wired charging is a game-changer. It can achieve 64% charge in just 30 minutes, while the Umidigi A15C is limited to a slow 10W charge. This difference in charging speed significantly impacts usability, allowing the Poco M5s to quickly top up when needed, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi A15C if you prioritize a very basic, functional smartphone and are on an extremely tight budget, and don't mind slower performance and charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M5s if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, a brighter and more visible display, and the convenience of rapid 33W charging, even if it means spending slightly more.