Umidigi A13 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, coupled with 67W fast charging, provides a significantly smoother user experience and drastically reduces downtime. While the Umidigi A13 Pro offers a lower entry price, the Poco X4 Pro’s performance and convenience justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi A13 Pro | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.61 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Sunglow Gold, Galaxy Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | - | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi A13 Pro
- Lowest possible price point
- Acceptable battery endurance
- 5G connectivity
- Slow 10W charging
- Underpowered Unisoc T610 chipset
- Limited detailed specifications
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Likely better software optimization
- Higher price than Umidigi A13 Pro
- Display specs lack detail
- 2MP macro camera is largely unnecessary
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing for the Umidigi A13 Pro. The Poco X4 Pro 5G, while also lacking detailed specs, benefits from Xiaomi’s generally strong display calibration. The absence of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on battery life over visual fluidity. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means the display will not dynamically adjust refresh rates to save power.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are scarce. Without sensor size or aperture information for the Umidigi A13 Pro, it’s difficult to assess its camera performance. The Poco X4 Pro 5G likely benefits from Xiaomi’s image processing algorithms, but again, detailed specs are needed for a proper comparison. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited real-world utility due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) is a clear upgrade over the Umidigi A13 Pro’s Unisoc T610 (12nm). The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 translates to better power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Snapdragon’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, also outperform the Cortex-A75 cores in the Unisoc T610, clocked at 1.8 GHz. This difference will be most noticeable in gaming and multitasking. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural advantages of Qualcomm’s design are substantial.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar battery life under moderate usage. However, the charging capabilities are vastly different. The Umidigi A13 Pro is limited to 10W wired charging, meaning a full charge will take a considerable amount of time. The Poco X4 Pro 5G, with its 67W wired charging (PD3.0, QC3), can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. This difference in charging speed is a game-changer for users who value convenience and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi A13 Pro if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and are willing to compromise on performance and charging speed. It’s suitable for very basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prioritize a responsive user experience, faster app loading times, and the convenience of incredibly quick charging – especially if you’re a moderate to heavy smartphone user.