Umidigi A13 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth experience and a reliable brand, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. Its Exynos 1280 chipset and brighter display offer a noticeable performance and visual upgrade, justifying the higher price tag. However, the Umidigi A13 Pro presents a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi A13 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.61 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Sunglow Gold, Galaxy Blue | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | - | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | - | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi A13 Pro
- Significantly lower price point
- 5G connectivity for budget users
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Weak processor performance
- Basic display quality
- Limited camera capabilities
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Powerful Exynos 1280 chipset
- Bright and vibrant display
- Faster 25W charging
- Higher price tag
- Potential for software bloat (Samsung)
- May not be the best value for extremely budget-conscious buyers
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 830 nits, compared to an unstated brightness for the Umidigi A13 Pro. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both are likely to use LCD panels given the price points, the A53’s higher peak brightness and 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely marketing for a good LCD) will deliver a more engaging viewing experience. The A13 Pro’s display specs are minimal, suggesting a more basic panel focused on cost reduction.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are lacking for the Umidigi A13 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s well-regarded image processing algorithms. While sensor size and aperture details are missing for both, the A53’s brand reputation suggests a more refined camera experience. The A13 Pro’s camera is likely to be adequate for casual snapshots, but will struggle in low-light conditions and lack the dynamic range of the A53.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s Exynos 1280 (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Umidigi A13 Pro’s Unisoc T610 (12nm). The Exynos 1280 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4GHz, offering significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance than the A13 Pro’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.8GHz. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos also provides better power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained tasks. The A13 Pro will handle basic tasks, but the A53 5G will offer a much smoother experience with demanding apps and games.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite the A13 Pro’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s 25W wired charging is a significant advantage over the A13 Pro’s slow 10W charging. This means the A53 5G can be topped up much faster, minimizing downtime. While both may last a full day, the A53’s faster charging provides greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi A13 Pro if you need a functional 5G smartphone on an extremely tight budget and are willing to compromise on performance and camera quality. It’s ideal for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prioritize a smoother user experience, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more capable camera system, even if it means spending significantly more.