Umidigi A13 Pro vs Realme 9 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison for Budget-Conscious Buyers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and convenience, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset and 60W charging significantly outperform the Umidigi A13 Pro’s Unisoc T610 and 10W charging. However, the A13 Pro remains a viable option for those on an extremely tight budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi A13 Pro | Realme 9 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 168 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.61 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1650 pixels (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 106.2 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Sunglow Gold, Galaxy Blue | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | - | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | - | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9) GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi A13 Pro
- Significantly lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially longer standby time due to less powerful processor
- Slow 10W charging
- Underpowered Unisoc T610 chipset
- Likely inferior camera performance
Realme 9 Pro+
- Fast 60W charging with PD3.0
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset
- Superior display quality (likely)
- Excellent battery endurance (117h)
- Higher price tag
- May require more frequent charging with heavy use
Display Comparison
The Realme 9 Pro+ boasts an unspecified, but likely high-quality, display with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks and vibrant colors. While the Umidigi A13 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, its budget positioning suggests a lower-quality panel. The Realme’s likely higher brightness and potentially higher refresh rate (based on Realme’s typical offerings) would translate to better visibility outdoors and smoother scrolling. The lack of display details for the A13 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult, but it’s safe to assume the Realme 9 Pro+ offers a superior viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While both phones feature cameras, the Realme 9 Pro+ is expected to have a more sophisticated setup. The A13 Pro’s camera specifications are not detailed, but budget phones often compromise on sensor size and image processing. The Realme 9 Pro+ likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms, resulting in better low-light performance and more detailed photos. The absence of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device makes it difficult to assess video stabilization capabilities, but Realme typically includes OIS in its Pro+ models. The A13 Pro likely relies heavily on software processing, which may not match the quality of the Realme’s hardware and software combination.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 9 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 920, fabricated on a 6nm process, featuring a powerful octa-core CPU with 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This translates to significantly faster processing speeds and improved graphics performance compared to the Umidigi A13 Pro’s Unisoc T610 (12nm). The T610, with its 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is geared towards basic tasks. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 920 also offers better power efficiency, meaning less heat generation and potentially less throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. Users who play demanding games or frequently multitask will see a substantial benefit from the Realme 9 Pro+.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+’s 60W wired charging with PD3.0 support is a game-changer, advertised to reach 100% charge in just 44 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Umidigi A13 Pro’s slow 10W wired charging. While the A13 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Realme 9 Pro+ boasts an endurance rating of 117 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The faster charging of the Realme 9 Pro+ minimizes downtime and provides greater convenience for users who are constantly on the go. The difference in charging speed alone is a compelling reason to choose the Realme.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi A13 Pro if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is under $150. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you prioritize smoother multitasking, gaming, faster charging, and a more responsive overall experience, and are willing to spend around $300.