Umidigi A11S vs Motorola Moto G30: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Shoppers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G30 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 662 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Umidigi A11S’s Unisoc Tiger T310, translating to smoother multitasking and app loading. While both offer similar battery endurance, the G30’s slightly faster charging and brighter display add to its overall appeal.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Umidigi A11S | Motorola Moto G30 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021. Released 2021 | 2021, February 16 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75 x 9.2 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.36 in) | 165.2 x 75.7 x 9.1 mm (6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W / 20W wired (market dependent) |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mist Blue, Frost Grey | Phantom Black (Dark Pearl), Pastel Sky |
| Models | - | XT2129-1, XT2129-2, PAML0000IN |
| Price | - | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.11 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1984:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.7 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 170968 (v8) GeekBench: 1265 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Umidigi A11S
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Decent battery endurance
- Significantly weaker processor
- Likely lower display quality
- Slower charging speed
Motorola Moto G30
- More powerful Snapdragon 662 processor
- Brighter and more visible display
- Faster charging options
- May be slightly more expensive
- Similar battery endurance to A11S
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G30 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 468 nits compared to an unlisted value for the Umidigi A11S, suggesting the Moto G30 is more usable outdoors. Both displays share a similar contrast ratio around 1975:1 to 1984:1, indicating comparable color depth. However, the brighter panel on the Moto G30 will provide a more vibrant and clear viewing experience, especially in sunlight. The lack of detailed display specs for the A11S makes a precise comparison difficult, but the G30 clearly has an advantage in visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly enhance the photography experience, serving more as a marketing feature than a practical tool.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G30’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) is an octa-core processor with a combination of Kryo 260 Gold and Silver cores, offering a more balanced and powerful performance profile than the Umidigi A11S’s Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) quad-core setup. The Snapdragon 662’s eight cores versus the A11S’s four will result in smoother multitasking and faster app launch times. While both CPUs feature cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 1.8 GHz, the architectural differences and core count favor the Snapdragon 662. The 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 662 also contributes to better power efficiency compared to the 12nm Unisoc chip.
Battery Life
Both the Umidigi A11S and Motorola Moto G30 achieve an endurance rating of 131 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Moto G30 offers faster charging options, supporting 15W or 20W wired charging (market dependent) compared to the A11S’s 10W charging. This translates to a quicker top-up time, reducing downtime. While the mAh capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging on the Moto G30 provides a practical advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Umidigi A11S if your primary need is a functional smartphone for very basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and you are prioritizing the absolute lowest price. Buy the Motorola Moto G30 if you value a more responsive user experience, a brighter and more visible display, and a slightly faster charging speed, even if it means spending a bit more.