The smartwatch market offers a wide range of options, from budget-friendly trackers to premium, feature-rich devices. We're pitting the Ulefone Watch GPS, a contender focused on core functionality and affordability, against the Honor Watch GS 3, a more established player boasting a broader feature set and a higher price point. Both utilize wireless charging, but their approaches to smartwatch technology diverge significantly.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing affordability and basic GPS tracking, the Ulefone Watch GPS offers compelling value. However, the Honor Watch GS 3 wins for those seeking a more refined experience with potentially more advanced health tracking and a wider ecosystem of features, justifying its higher cost.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | N/A |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | No | No |
| Speed | No | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| | - | No |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 27. Released 2020, October 27 | 2022, January 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, January 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, stainless steel frame 316L |
| Dimensions | 42 x 37 x 12 mm (1.65 x 1.46 x 0.47 in) | 45.9 x 45.9 x 10.5 mm (1.81 x 1.81 x 0.41 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 35 g (1.23 oz) | 44 g (1.55 oz) |
| | 50m water resistant, 5ATM (up to 10 mins) | 50m water resistant
5 ATM
Compatible with standard 22mm straps |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 240 pixels (~261 ppi density) | 466 x 466 pixels (~326 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.3 inches | 1.43 inches |
| Type | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| OS | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | - | 4GB 32MB RAM |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | No | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, LE, EDR |
| NFC | No | Yes (China only) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, compass, SpO2 |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Wireless | Wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 210 mAh | Li-Po 451 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black/Green, Black/Red, Pink/Blue | Black, Steel, Gold |
| Models | - | MUS-B19 |
| Price | About 40 EUR | About 220 EUR |
Ulefone Watch GPS
- Affordable price point
- Wireless charging convenience
- Focus on core GPS tracking functionality
- Limited feature set compared to competitors
- Missing display and performance specifications suggest potential compromises in quality
Honor Watch GS 3
- Premium design and build quality
- Likely advanced health and fitness tracking features
- Wireless charging for convenient power-up
- Higher price point
- Potential ecosystem lock-in with Honor/Huawei
Display Comparison
Both the Ulefone Watch GPS and Honor Watch GS 3 employ wireless charging, indicating a focus on convenience. However, details regarding display technology (AMOLED, LCD, resolution, brightness) are absent for the Ulefone Watch GPS. The Honor Watch GS 3, positioned as a premium device, likely features a higher-resolution AMOLED display with superior brightness and color accuracy, offering a more vibrant and readable experience, particularly outdoors. The absence of display specs for the Ulefone suggests a cost-cutting measure, potentially resulting in a less visually appealing screen.
Camera Comparison
Neither device is marketed as having camera capabilities, focusing instead on fitness and notification features. Therefore, a camera comparison is irrelevant. The absence of a camera aligns with the typical design of GPS-focused smartwatches.
Performance
Without chipset details for the Ulefone Watch GPS, it's reasonable to assume it utilizes a less powerful processor than the Honor Watch GS 3. Honor typically equips its GS series with capable processors for smooth operation and responsive tracking. While both are likely sufficient for basic smartwatch functions, the Honor Watch GS 3 will likely handle more complex tasks, such as music playback and advanced health monitoring, with greater ease. RAM specifications are also missing for the Ulefone, further suggesting a focus on essential functionality over performance headroom.
Battery Life
Both devices utilize wireless charging, simplifying the charging process. However, without mAh ratings for either device, a direct battery life comparison is impossible. The Honor Watch GS 3, given its premium positioning, likely benefits from optimized power management and potentially a larger battery capacity, translating to longer usage between charges. The Ulefone Watch GPS, prioritizing affordability, may offer shorter battery life, requiring more frequent charging, but the convenience of wireless charging mitigates this to some extent.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Watch GPS if you need a simple, reliable GPS watch for tracking outdoor activities without breaking the bank. It's ideal for casual runners, hikers, or anyone wanting basic fitness monitoring. Buy the Honor Watch GS 3 if you prefer a premium design, a more comprehensive suite of health and fitness features, and seamless integration with the Honor/Huawei ecosystem. It caters to users who demand a polished smartwatch experience and are willing to pay for it.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Ulefone Watch GPS have a companion app for detailed data analysis?
While specifics are limited, most GPS smartwatches require a companion app for syncing data and viewing detailed activity metrics. The quality and features of the Ulefone Watch GPS app are likely less comprehensive than those offered by Honor, given the price difference.
❓ Is the Honor Watch GS 3 compatible with iPhones?
Honor watches generally offer limited compatibility with iPhones. While basic features like time and notifications may work, full functionality, including advanced health tracking and app integration, is typically restricted to Android devices.
❓ What type of wireless charging standard do both watches use?
Without specific details, it's likely both watches utilize the Qi wireless charging standard, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of wireless chargers. However, charging speeds may vary between the two devices.
