Ulefone Tab A8 vs. Ulefone Armor Pad: A Detailed Tablet Showdown

Ulefone offers a range of budget-friendly tablets, and the Tab A8 and Armor Pad are two popular choices. But which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, features, and performance to help you make an informed decision.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Ulefone Armor Pad takes the crown thanks to its significantly better battery life, faster charging (18W vs 10W), and rugged design. While the Tab A8 might be slightly more affordable, the Armor Pad's durability and extended battery make it the superior overall choice for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names Ulefone Tab A8 Ulefone Armor Pad
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2023, January 112023, March 22
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, January 11Available. Released 2023, March 22
Body
Dimensions238.7 x 157.5 x 7.4 mm (9.40 x 6.20 x 0.29 in)213 x 128.8 x 14 mm (8.39 x 5.07 x 0.55 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight483 g (1.06 lb)560 g (1.23 lb)
 -IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope)
Display
Protection-Mohs level 4
Resolution1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density)800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density)
Size10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.7% screen-to-body ratio)8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~67.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetMediatek MT6762V/WD (12 nm)Mediatek MT6762 Helio G25 (12 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320PowerVR GE8320
OSAndroid 12Android 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single13 MP, f/2.0, (wide)13 MP, f/2.2, AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP, f/2.2, (wide)5 MP, f/2.0
Video1080p@30fpsYes
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)Yes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radio, RDS, recordingWireless FM radio, RDS, recording
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximityFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging10W wired18W Wired
TypeLi-Po 6580 mAhLi-Po 7650 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsGrayBlack
PriceAbout 180 EURAbout 200 EUR
EU LABEL
Battery-83:38h endurance, 1000 cycles
Energy-Class F
Free fall-Class A (270 falls)
Repairability-Class C

Ulefone Tab A8

  • More affordable
  • Lightweight
  • Basic tablet functionality

  • Slow charging (10W)
  • Limited battery life
  • Less durable
  • Lower performance

Ulefone Armor Pad

  • Rugged and durable design
  • Exceptional battery life (83:38h)
  • Faster charging (18W)
  • Slightly better performance

  • Potentially higher price
  • Bulkier design
  • Average display quality

Display Comparison

Both tablets feature an 8-inch display, likely with a resolution around 1280x800. Expect similar viewing experiences, though the Armor Pad might have slightly better outdoor visibility due to potential anti-reflective coating (typical for rugged devices). Color accuracy and brightness are likely to be average on both.

Camera Comparison

Camera quality on budget tablets is rarely a highlight. Expect basic cameras on both devices, suitable for occasional snapshots but not for serious photography. The Armor Pad might have a slightly more robust camera module due to its rugged design.

Performance

The Armor Pad boasts a slightly more optimized chipset (Helio G25) and a dual-cluster CPU configuration (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) compared to the Tab A8's MT6762V. This translates to marginally better performance in everyday tasks and potentially smoother gaming, though neither tablet is a powerhouse.

Battery Life

This is where the Armor Pad truly shines. Its advertised 83:38h endurance and 1000 cycles are exceptional, far surpassing the Tab A8's likely shorter battery life and slower 10W charging. The Armor Pad is designed for extended use without frequent charging.

Buying Guide

The Ulefone Tab A8 is ideal for casual users who prioritize affordability and basic tablet functionality for browsing, light gaming, and media consumption. The Ulefone Armor Pad is perfect for those needing a rugged, durable tablet for outdoor use, construction, or demanding environments where battery life is paramount.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Ulefone Armor Pad waterproof?
Yes, the Armor Pad is designed to be waterproof and dustproof, typically with an IP68 or IP69K rating, making it suitable for harsh environments.
❓ Can I play demanding games on either of these tablets?
Neither tablet is ideal for demanding games. They can handle basic games, but expect lower frame rates and graphical settings.
❓ What is the storage capacity of each tablet?
Typically, both tablets offer around 32GB or 64GB of internal storage, expandable via microSD card.
❓ What operating system do these tablets run?
Both tablets likely run Android 10 or 11, with Ulefone's custom UI on top.