Ulefone Tab A8 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE: A Tablet Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE is the clear winner, offering significantly better performance, a superior display, faster charging, and a more refined overall experience. While the Ulefone Tab A8 is cheaper, the S7 FE's value proposition is hard to ignore for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Tab A8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 11 | 2021, May 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 11 | Available. Released 2021, June 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 238.7 x 157.5 x 7.4 mm (9.40 x 6.20 x 0.29 in) | 284.8 x 185 x 6.3 mm (11.21 x 7.28 x 0.25 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 483 g (1.06 lb) | 608 g (1.34 lb) |
| - | Stylus support | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~243 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.4 inches, 445.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) - 5G modelOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) - Wi-Fi model |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762V/WD (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) - 5G modelQualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) - Wi-Fi model |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 - 5G modelAdreno 642L - Wi-Fi model |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE (Wi-Fi), 5.2, A2DP, LE (5G) |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO - cellular model only |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 (Wi-Fi), Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (5G) |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro (5G model only) |
| - | Samsung DeX | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 45W wired, 100% in 190 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6580 mAh | Li-Po 10090 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray | Mystic Black, Mystic Silver, Mystic Green, Mystic Pink |
| Models | - | SM-T730, SM-T733, SM-T736B, SM-T735 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 650 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.15 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1886:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 292530 (v8), 355430 (v9) GeekBench: 1904 (v5.1) GFXBench: 9.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Tab A8
- Very affordable
- Decent for basic tasks
- Large screen size
- Weak performance
- Low-quality display
- Slow charging
- Limited storage
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE
- Powerful performance
- Excellent display (120Hz)
- Fast charging (45W)
- Good battery life
- Expandable storage
- More expensive
- Design is somewhat basic
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE boasts a significantly superior display. Its 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, and the higher brightness (522 nits) makes it more usable outdoors. The contrast ratio is also notably better. The Ulefone Tab A8 likely has a standard 60Hz display with lower brightness and contrast, resulting in a less vibrant and immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While neither tablet excels in camera quality, the Galaxy Tab S7 FE likely offers slightly better image quality due to Samsung's image processing. Expect more detail and better dynamic range. The Ulefone Tab A8's camera is likely adequate for basic video calls but not much more.
Performance
The Galaxy Tab S7 FE's Snapdragon 750G or 778G (depending on the model) blows the Ulefone Tab A8's MT6762V chipset out of the water. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the S7 FE. The Ulefone Tab A8 will struggle with demanding apps and games.
Battery Life
The Galaxy Tab S7 FE's 45W charging is a huge advantage, allowing for much faster charging times compared to the Ulefone Tab A8's 10W charging. Both tablets likely offer decent battery life for typical usage, but the S7 FE's larger battery capacity may give it a slight edge.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Ulefone Tab A8? Those on a very tight budget who primarily need a tablet for basic tasks like browsing and media consumption. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE? Anyone seeking a more powerful, versatile tablet for gaming, productivity, and enjoying multimedia content.