The Ulefone Tab A11 Pro and Doogee T10W represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded budget tablet space. While both aim to deliver an affordable Android experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Tab A11 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Doogee T10W’s Unisoc Tiger T310, justifying the slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June | 2024, August |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Available. Released 2024, August |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 256.9 x 168.4 x 7.6 mm (10.11 x 6.63 x 0.30 in) | 246.1 x 162.8 x 9.7 mm (9.69 x 6.41 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 500.5 g (1.10 lb) | 555 g (1.22 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~81.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8300 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 8800 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Black, Blue |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 70 EUR |
Ulefone Tab A11 Pro
- Significantly faster processor with the Mediatek Helio G99.
- More efficient 6nm fabrication process for better battery life and less heat.
- Faster 18W wired charging for quicker top-ups.
- Likely a higher price point compared to the Doogee T10W.
- Specific display details are unknown.
Doogee T10W
- Lower price point, making it more accessible.
- Sufficient for basic tasks like reading and video streaming.
- Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful processor (depending on battery capacity).
- Significantly slower processor with the Unisoc Tiger T310.
- Slower 10W charging.
- Less capable of handling demanding applications or gaming.
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the A11 Pro’s focus on overall performance, it’s reasonable to expect a higher resolution panel and potentially better color accuracy. The T10W, targeting a lower price point, likely utilizes a more cost-effective display solution. Bezels are likely similar across both devices, reflecting the budget nature of the tablets.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a detailed comparison is impossible. However, it’s safe to assume both tablets feature entry-level camera systems geared towards casual photography. The absence of information suggests neither device prioritizes camera quality as a key selling point. Any included 2MP macro lenses on either device are likely to offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Ulefone Tab A11 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) boasts an octa-core configuration with two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architecture provides a significant performance uplift compared to the Doogee T10W’s Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm), which features a quad-core setup with a single Cortex-A75 core at 2.0 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz. The 6nm fabrication process of the Helio G99 also translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This means the A11 Pro will handle multitasking, gaming, and demanding apps more smoothly.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the charging speeds reveal a clear advantage for the Ulefone Tab A11 Pro with its 18W wired charging capability. The Doogee T10W is limited to 10W charging. This difference translates to significantly faster charging times for the A11 Pro, reducing downtime and improving usability. Even with a similar battery capacity, the faster charging speed makes the A11 Pro more convenient.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Tab A11 Pro if you need a tablet capable of handling demanding applications, moderate gaming, and benefit from faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for students, professionals needing on-the-go productivity, and users who value a smoother overall experience. Buy the Doogee T10W if your primary use case is basic media consumption – reading ebooks, streaming videos – and you prioritize absolute affordability over raw performance. It’s a suitable option for casual users with minimal demands.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Ulefone Tab A11 Pro handle graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Mediatek Helio G99 chipset in the Ulefone Tab A11 Pro is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The 6nm process and octa-core architecture provide a performance advantage over the Doogee T10W, but it’s not a flagship gaming processor.
❓ Is the Unisoc Tiger T310 in the Doogee T10W sufficient for everyday tasks like browsing and email?
Yes, the Unisoc Tiger T310 is perfectly adequate for basic tasks such as web browsing, email, and document editing. However, it will struggle with multitasking or demanding applications. It’s best suited for users with light usage patterns.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Doogee T10W from 0% with its 10W charging?
With 10W charging, a full charge from 0% on the Doogee T10W will likely take between 3-5 hours, depending on the battery capacity (which is currently unknown). This is considerably slower than the Ulefone Tab A11 Pro’s 18W charging.
