The Ulefone Tab A10 and Doogee T10W represent a growing segment of ultra-affordable Android tablets. Both aim to deliver a functional tablet experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison focuses on the core performance and endurance differences between these two devices, helping you determine which best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Ulefone Tab A10 is the better choice. Its Unisoc T615 chipset, featuring a more robust CPU core configuration, coupled with its significantly longer 66:45h battery endurance, outweighs the Doogee T10W’s lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March | 2024, August |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March | Available. Released 2024, August |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 237.7 x 156.5 x 7.8 mm (9.36 x 6.16 x 0.31 in) | 246.1 x 162.8 x 9.7 mm (9.69 x 6.41 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 452.5 g (1.00 lb) | 555 g (1.22 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~79.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8300 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 2 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6600 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Gray | Black, Blue |
| Price | - | About 70 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 66:45h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class F | - |
| Free fall | Class D (52 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Tab A10
- Superior CPU performance with octa-core configuration
- Significantly longer battery life (66:45h endurance)
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Likely higher price point than the Doogee T10W
- Display specifications are unknown
Doogee T10W
- Lowest possible price point
- Acceptable for basic tasks like web browsing
- Compact and lightweight design (assumed)
- Quad-core CPU struggles with multitasking
- Slower 10W charging
- Lower battery endurance
Display Comparison
Neither Ulefone nor Doogee provide display specifications beyond screen size. Given the price point, expect both tablets to utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of details like peak brightness or color gamut suggests neither is optimized for outdoor visibility or color-critical work. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, contributing to a larger overall footprint. Without further data, a direct comparison is impossible, but the display is unlikely to be a deciding factor for most buyers in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a strength for either tablet. Both manufacturers typically equip budget tablets with basic sensors. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume image quality will be adequate for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions, but will suffer in low light. Focusing on megapixel counts would be misleading; image processing and sensor size are far more important, and neither manufacturer provides this information. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device further limits low-light capabilities.
Performance
The core performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Ulefone Tab A10’s Unisoc T615 utilizes an octa-core configuration with 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This provides a significant advantage in multi-threaded tasks compared to the Doogee T10W’s Unisoc Tiger T310, which features a quad-core setup with 1x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both chips are built on a 12nm process, the A75 core count in the T615 translates to smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. The T310’s single A75 core will struggle with more demanding applications. The lack of LPDDR RAM specifications makes it difficult to assess memory bandwidth, but it’s likely both utilize slower, cost-optimized RAM configurations.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key differentiator. The Ulefone Tab A10 boasts an impressive 66:45h endurance rating, indicating significantly longer usage between charges. This is likely due to the more efficient CPU and optimized power management. The Doogee T10W, while not specifying endurance, offers a slower 10W wired charging speed compared to the A10’s 18W. This means the A10 will not only last longer on a single charge but also recharge faster when needed. The A10’s stated 1000 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan before significant battery degradation.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Tab A10 if you need a tablet for extended reading sessions, streaming video on the go, or light productivity tasks where consistent performance and long battery life are paramount. Buy the Doogee T10W if you prioritize absolute lowest cost and your usage is limited to very basic tasks like web browsing and occasional video playback, and you have consistent access to a charger.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Ulefone Tab A10 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Unisoc T615 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, expect to play at lower graphics settings and frame rates. The chipset isn't designed for high-end gaming, and sustained performance may be limited due to thermal constraints. The Doogee T10W’s T310 will struggle even more with this title.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Ulefone Tab A10 with the 18W charger?
While a precise 0-100% charge time isn't specified, the 18W charging should be significantly faster than the Doogee T10W’s 10W charging. Expect a full charge in approximately 3-4 hours, depending on usage during charging.
❓ Is the Ulefone Tab A10 suitable for video conferencing?
The Ulefone Tab A10 should be adequate for basic video conferencing using apps like Zoom or Google Meet. However, the lack of detailed camera specifications suggests the front-facing camera quality may be limited, potentially impacting video clarity. The T615 chipset should handle the processing load without significant issues.
❓ Can I expand the storage on either the Ulefone Tab A10 or Doogee T10W with a microSD card?
Neither Ulefone nor Doogee explicitly state microSD card support in the provided data. However, given the target market and typical budget tablet configurations, it's highly probable that both devices include a microSD card slot for expandable storage. Check the full specifications on the manufacturer's website to confirm.
