Ulefone RugKing vs. Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Durable Smartphones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime and a lower price point, the Ulefone RugKing is the clear winner. Its exceptional 106-hour endurance significantly outpaces the XR20. However, the Nokia XR20 appeals to those needing 5G and the convenience of wireless charging, despite a shorter battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone RugKing | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 15 | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 173.4 x 83.4 x 18.3 mm (6.83 x 3.28 x 0.72 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 397 g (14.00 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.99 inches, 92.6 cm2 (~64.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 60Hz, 910 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7255 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (126dB) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 5W reverse wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 9600 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 106:26h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone RugKing
- Exceptional battery life (106:26h endurance)
- More affordable price point
- High battery cycle count (1000 cycles)
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Less powerful chipset compared to the XR20
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Wireless charging support (15W)
- More modern chipset (Snapdragon 480)
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Higher price compared to the RugKing
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details on panel type, resolution, and refresh rate are missing, but the focus here is clearly on durability, not visual fidelity. The absence of LTPO or high refresh rates suggests both prioritize power efficiency. Bezels are likely substantial on both to contribute to shock absorption. Color accuracy is expected to be standard for this price segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse, but the focus isn't on photography prowess. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but without sensor size or aperture information, a detailed comparison is difficult. The XR20’s Qualcomm ISP will likely offer better image processing capabilities, particularly in low light. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and shouldn’t influence purchasing decisions. Expect adequate, but not exceptional, image quality from both.
Performance
The chipset choice defines the performance profiles. The Ulefone RugKing’s Unisoc T7255 (12nm) is geared towards efficiency, utilizing a Cortex-A75/A55 configuration. The Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) offers a more modern architecture and, crucially, 5G connectivity. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.0 GHz core and 6x1.8 GHz cores, the 8nm process of the Snapdragon 480 should translate to better thermal management and slightly improved sustained performance. The XR20 will handle 5G networks, a feature absent in the RugKing. RAM details are missing, but the Snapdragon 480 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimizations.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Ulefone RugKing truly shines. Its 106:26h endurance is exceptional, suggesting a large battery capacity optimized by the efficient Unisoc T7255 chipset. The Nokia XR20, while offering the convenience of 15W wireless charging, lags behind with an unspecified endurance figure. The RugKing’s 18W wired charging is standard, while the XR20’s 18W wired and 15W wireless options provide flexibility. The RugKing’s claimed 1000 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone RugKing if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, work in environments where power access is limited, and value affordability above all else. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you require 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, and prefer a phone from a brand with a strong software update commitment.