Ulefone Power Armor X11 Pro vs Nokia XR20: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Nokia XR20 emerges as the clear winner. While the Ulefone Power Armor X11 Pro offers a competitive price, the XR20’s superior chipset, 5G connectivity, wireless charging, and overall build quality make it the more compelling choice for most users seeking a truly rugged experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor X11 Pro | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| eMMC 5.1 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 16 | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 16 | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 76.7 x 19.3 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.76 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 330 g (11.64 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~63.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 8150 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Ulefone Power Armor X11 Pro
- Excellent battery life
- Rugged design
- Affordable price
- Expandable storage
- Slow performance
- Outdated chipset
- Lower screen quality
- No 5G
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity
- Faster performance
- Wireless charging
- Durable build
- Better camera
- Shorter battery life than Ulefone
- Higher price
- Less expandable storage
Display Comparison
The Nokia XR20 boasts a brighter and more color-accurate display, offering a better viewing experience. Both phones feature durable screens, but the XR20's panel generally provides superior image quality. The Ulefone has a slightly larger screen, but the XR20's display is the better performer.
Camera Comparison
The Nokia XR20 generally captures better photos and videos, thanks to its more advanced image processing and potentially better sensor. While both phones offer decent camera capabilities, the XR20 consistently delivers more detailed and vibrant results, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Both have 13MP front cameras.
Performance
The Nokia XR20's Snapdragon 480 5G chipset is significantly faster and more efficient than the Ulefone's Helio G25. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user interface. The XR20's 8nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Power Armor X11 Pro typically offers longer battery life due to its larger battery capacity (6000mAh vs XR20's 4470mAh). However, the XR20's more efficient chipset helps offset this difference, and the addition of wireless charging provides added convenience.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Power Armor X11 Pro is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and don't need 5G. The Nokia XR20 is perfect for those who demand top-tier durability, 5G connectivity, wireless charging, and a smoother overall user experience, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.