Ulefone Power Armor 20WT vs. Cat S75: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Cat S75 emerges as the stronger contender thanks to its Dimensity 930 chipset. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 20WT offers a compelling value proposition with its 33W fast charging and competitive performance for a lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 20WT | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 08 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 08 | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 79.2 x 18.1 mm (6.49 x 3.12 x 0.71 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 382 g (13.47 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~427 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.65 inches, 82.4 cm2 (~63.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 10850 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 600 EUR |
Ulefone Power Armor 20WT
- Faster 33W Wired Charging
- Potentially Lower Price Point
- Rugged Design for Demanding Environments
- Less Powerful Processor (Helio G99)
- Potentially Slower App Loading Times
Cat S75
- More Powerful Processor (Dimensity 930)
- Wireless Charging Convenience
- Superior Image Processing Capabilities
- Slower 15W Wireless Charging
- Higher Price Point
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S75's higher price point, it's reasonable to expect a slightly more refined display experience, potentially with better color accuracy and viewing angles. Rugged phones often prioritize durability over display quality, so both will likely feature robust glass protection, but peak brightness and resolution are unknown variables.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference indirectly impacts camera performance. The Dimensity 930’s superior image signal processor (ISP) will likely result in better image processing, improved dynamic range, and faster image capture speeds. While both phones likely feature multiple cameras, the S75’s ISP will be better equipped to handle complex scenes and low-light conditions. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Cat S75’s Mediatek Dimensity 930, built on a 6nm process, utilizes Cortex-A78 cores, offering a significant architectural advantage over the Ulefone 20WT’s Helio G99. While both are 6nm, the A78 cores in the Dimensity 930 provide superior single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The G99’s Cortex-A76 cores are still capable, but lag behind in raw processing power. This benefits users who engage in demanding tasks like video editing or graphically intensive gaming. The Dimensity 930 also boasts a more powerful GPU, further widening the performance gap.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device, making a direct mAh comparison impossible. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Ulefone 20WT’s 33W wired charging is significantly faster than the Cat S75’s 15W wireless charging. For users who prioritize quick top-ups, the 20WT is the clear winner. Wireless charging on the S75 offers convenience, but comes at the cost of charging speed. The actual battery life will depend on usage patterns and battery capacity, but the faster charging of the 20WT mitigates concerns about running out of power during long workdays.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 20WT if you need a highly durable phone with rapid wired charging and are on a tighter budget. It’s ideal for users who frequently work in challenging environments and need a reliable device that can quickly get back to full power. Buy the Cat S75 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive user experience, value the convenience of wireless charging, and are willing to pay a premium for a more powerful processor capable of handling demanding tasks and future software updates.