Ulefone Power Armor 19 vs. Oukitel WP210: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Oukitel WP210 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 19 remains a compelling option for those seeking a more affordable, still-capable rugged device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 19 | Oukitel WP210 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 27 | 2025, July |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 27 | Available. Released 2025, July 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 409 g (14.43 oz) | 311 g (10.97 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed | 45W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 9600 mAh | Li-Po 8800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Gray, Black, Red |
| Price | About 400 EUR | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 86:17h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
Ulefone Power Armor 19
- Faster wired charging (66W)
- Wireless charging support (15W)
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful processor (Helio G99)
- Potentially lower image quality
Oukitel WP210
- Significantly more powerful processor (Dimensity 8200)
- Exceptional battery endurance (86:17h)
- Longer battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Slower wired charging (45W)
- Higher price
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP210's higher overall positioning, it likely features a higher-quality panel with potentially better color accuracy and brightness. The Power Armor 19, aiming for a lower price point, may utilize a more cost-effective display solution. Bezels are likely comparable given the rugged design constraints of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the WP210’s higher-end chipset suggests a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The Ulefone Power Armor 19 will likely offer a functional camera system, but it won’t match the WP210’s capabilities in terms of detail, dynamic range, and overall image quality. We can assume both will feature multiple lenses, but the WP210 is more likely to have larger sensors and optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The Oukitel WP210’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Ulefone Power Armor 19’s Helio G99 (6nm). The Dimensity 8200’s core configuration – 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides significantly more processing power than the G99’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8200 also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. This benefits gamers and users running resource-intensive applications. The WP210 will deliver a smoother, faster experience overall.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP210 boasts an impressive 86:17h endurance rating and a claimed 1000 charge cycles, indicating exceptional battery longevity. While the Ulefone Power Armor 19’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 66W wired charging (52% in 30 min) is faster than the WP210’s 45W charging. The WP210’s endurance rating suggests a larger battery capacity, offsetting the slower charging speed. The inclusion of 15W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging on the Ulefone adds convenience, but the WP210’s longevity is a significant advantage for users who frequently rely on their phone throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19 if you need a robust, reliable rugged phone for basic tasks, navigation, and communication, and prioritize affordability. It's ideal for users who don't heavily game or run demanding applications. Buy the Oukitel WP210 if you demand high performance for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and are willing to pay a premium for the latest chipset and faster processing speeds. This is the phone for power users and those who need a device that can handle anything they throw at it.