Ulefone Power Armor 18T vs 20WT: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Power Armor 18T takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster Dimensity 900 chipset, faster charging (wired and wireless), and wireless power sharing. While the 20WT offers a more recent Helio G99, the 18T's overall performance and charging capabilities make it the stronger contender.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 18T | Ulefone Power Armor 20WT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 31 | 2023, March 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Available. Released 2023, March 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) | 164.8 x 79.2 x 18.1 mm (6.49 x 3.12 x 0.71 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 409 g (14.43 oz) | 382 g (13.47 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~427 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.65 inches, 82.4 cm2 (~63.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 9600 mAh | Li-Po 10850 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 640 EUR | About 330 EUR |
Ulefone Power Armor 18T
- Faster Processor (Dimensity 900)
- 66W Wired Charging
- 15W Wireless Charging
- Wireless Reverse Charging
- Potentially better image processing
- Potentially higher price
- Design might be slightly less modern
Ulefone Power Armor 20WT
- More recent chipset (Helio G99)
- Potentially more affordable
- Rugged design
- Slower 33W Wired Charging
- No Wireless Charging
- Less powerful processor
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar ruggedized displays, probably around 6.5-6.8 inches with a standard resolution (likely FHD+). The 18T might have slightly better color accuracy due to its more powerful chipset, but the difference will be minimal in real-world use. Expect both to be bright enough for outdoor visibility, a key feature for rugged phones.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, probably including a 48MP main sensor. Image quality will likely be comparable in good lighting conditions. The 18T's more powerful processor *could* offer slightly better image processing, but don't expect a dramatic difference. Low-light performance will likely be similar on both.
Performance
This is where the 18T shines. The Dimensity 900 is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Helio G99. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the 18T. The 20WT will still handle everyday tasks adequately, but it won't match the 18T's responsiveness.
Battery Life
Both phones boast large batteries (likely 6000-7000mAh). However, the 18T's 66W wired charging and 15W wireless charging provide a significant advantage. The 20WT's 33W wired charging is slower. Both should offer excellent battery life, easily lasting a full day or more.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Power Armor 18T is ideal for users prioritizing performance, fast charging, and wireless features. The Power Armor 20WT is a good option for those seeking a slightly more budget-friendly rugged phone with a focus on durability and a more recent chipset, but are less concerned with charging speed.