Ulefone Power Armor 18T vs Blackview BV9200: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Power Armor 18T is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 900 chipset offers a significant performance leap over the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96, making it better suited for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the BV9200’s brighter display is a notable advantage for outdoor visibility.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 18T | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 31 | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 409 g (14.43 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 9600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 640 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Ulefone Power Armor 18T
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 900)
- More efficient 6nm process node
- Wireless charging support (15W & 5W reverse)
- Faster wired charging (66W, 52% in 30 min)
- Display brightness likely lower than BV9200
- Display specifications largely unknown
Blackview BV9200
- Brighter display (481 nits)
- High contrast ratio (1423:1)
- Balanced feature set
- Potentially more affordable
- Less powerful processor (Helio G96)
- Less efficient 12nm process node
- No wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 481 nits and a 1423:1 contrast ratio, providing superior visibility in outdoor conditions. While the Ulefone Power Armor 18T’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to have a lower peak brightness. This difference is crucial for users frequently working or recreating in bright sunlight. The BV9200’s contrast ratio also suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors, enhancing the viewing experience. However, without knowing the panel technology (LTPO, AMOLED) of the Ulefone, a definitive judgment on color accuracy and power efficiency is impossible.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device beyond the presence of sensors, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market segment suggests the Ulefone 18T, being positioned as a higher-tier device, likely features a more capable primary sensor. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either phone suggests reliance on software stabilization. The prevalence of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices indicates they are likely included for marketing purposes rather than practical photographic utility. Image processing style will be a key differentiator, but without sample images, it’s impossible to assess.
Performance
The Ulefone Power Armor 18T’s Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm) chipset represents a substantial upgrade over the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 900’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offer significantly higher single-core performance than the BV9200’s 2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. The 6nm process node also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones feature an octa-core CPU with the same number of Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the architectural advantages of the Dimensity 900 will result in smoother multitasking and faster application loading times. The Ulefone is the clear choice for users who prioritize performance.
Battery Life
Both the Ulefone Power Armor 18T and Blackview BV9200 support 66W wired charging, promising rapid replenishment. The Ulefone further adds 15W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility. While the battery capacity of both devices is not specified, the Ulefone’s faster wired charging (66W vs 66W) and addition of wireless charging options provide a tangible advantage. The Ulefone claims 52% charge in 30 minutes, while the BV9200’s charging time is not specified. The combination of faster charging and wireless capabilities makes the Ulefone more convenient for users on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 18T if you need a rugged phone capable of handling intensive applications, demanding mobile games, and benefit from faster processing speeds. This is the phone for professionals relying on mobile workstations or gamers on the go. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you prioritize a brighter, more easily visible display in direct sunlight and are looking for a more balanced, cost-effective rugged phone for everyday use and less demanding tasks.