Ulefone Power Armor 18T vs Blackview BL8800 Pro: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Power Armor 18T takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster charging (66W vs 33W), more powerful Dimensity 900 chipset, and wireless charging capabilities. While the Blackview BL8800 Pro offers solid value, the Ulefone's performance and charging speed give it the edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 18T | Blackview BL8800 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 31 | 2022, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Available. Released 2022, May 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 409 g (14.43 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, thermal assisted camera FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 2x Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 9600 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 640 EUR | About 300 EUR |
Ulefone Power Armor 18T
- Faster Charging (66W)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Wireless Charging (5W)
- Reverse Wireless Charging
- Potentially Better Camera
- Potentially Higher Price
- Durability certifications may vary
Blackview BL8800 Pro
- More Affordable
- Decent Battery Life
- Rugged Design
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 700)
- Potentially Lower Camera Quality
- No Wireless Charging
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature durable displays, potentially with Gorilla Glass protection, but screen size, resolution, and panel type (LCD vs AMOLED) are key differentiators. The Ulefone likely has a slightly brighter display. Expect both to have good outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are crucial. While both likely have multiple rear cameras, the Ulefone likely has a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better image processing. Low-light performance and video recording capabilities will also differ.
Performance
The Ulefone Power Armor 18T's Dimensity 900 chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Blackview BL8800 Pro's Dimensity 700. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Ulefone.
Battery Life
Both phones boast large batteries, but the Ulefone's 66W wired charging is a game-changer. While the Blackview's battery life might be comparable in typical usage, the Ulefone can be topped up much faster.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Power Armor 18T is ideal for users prioritizing performance, fast charging, and wireless charging, even in rugged environments. The Blackview BL8800 Pro is a good choice for those seeking a more budget-friendly rugged option with decent battery life and durability.