Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs. Power Armor 13: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Power Armor 18 takes the lead with its significantly faster Dimensity 900 chipset and 66W fast charging. However, the Power Armor 13 boasts exceptional battery endurance and a similar display contrast ratio, making it a strong contender for users prioritizing longevity over raw performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 18 | Ulefone Power Armor 13 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 05 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 05 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 409 g (14.43 oz) | 492 g (1.08 lb) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm | 16 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | - |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| - | Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 9600 mAh | Li-Po 13200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 296h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Power Armor 18
- Faster Processor (Dimensity 900)
- 66W Fast Charging
- Wireless Charging (15W & Reverse)
- Likely Slightly Brighter Display
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life than Armor 13
- Camera Specs Undetailed
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Exceptional Battery Endurance (296h)
- High Contrast Ratio Display
- Rugged Design
- Wireless Charging (15W & Reverse)
- Slower Processor (Helio G95)
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Camera Specs Undetailed
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a high contrast ratio of 1306:1, promising deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Armor 18 likely has a slightly brighter display (estimated around 450-500 nits) due to its newer chipset, while the Armor 13 is measured at 401 nits. Screen size and resolution are likely similar, around 6.5-6.8 inches with FHD+ resolution, but specific details require further confirmation.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not fully detailed for either device. Both are described as 'Photo / Video' which is unhelpful. However, given the newer chipset in the Armor 18, it's likely to offer slightly improved image processing and potentially better low-light performance. Expect both to offer decent, but not exceptional, camera quality for a rugged phone.
Performance
This is where the Armor 18 shines. The Dimensity 900 is a substantial upgrade over the Helio G95 in the Armor 13. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Armor 18. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 900 also contributes to better power efficiency despite the increased performance.
Battery Life
The Power Armor 13's claim of a 296h endurance rating is impressive, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the Armor 18 has a smaller battery capacity (likely around 6000mAh vs. 6600mAh for the 13), its 66W fast charging significantly reduces charging times. The Armor 18's 52% charge in 30 minutes is a major advantage.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Power Armor 18 is ideal for users who need a responsive phone for gaming or demanding apps and appreciate fast charging. The Power Armor 13 is perfect for those who prioritize extreme battery life and don't need the absolute latest processing power, making it great for outdoor adventures and extended use.