Ulefone Power Armor 18 vs Samsung Galaxy M53: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy M53 offers a smoother user experience and potentially better camera performance, while the Power Armor 18 excels in durability and charging speed. If you need a phone that can withstand harsh conditions, Ulefone wins. For everyday use and a vibrant display, the M53 is the better choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 18 | Samsung Galaxy M53 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 05 | 2022, April 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 05 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) | 164.7 x 77 x 7.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 409 g (14.43 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 9600 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Green, Blue, Brown |
| Models | - | SM-M536B, SM-M536B/DS, SM-M536B/DSN |
| Price | About 400 EUR | € 249.98 |
| SAR | - | 1.31 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
Ulefone Power Armor 18
- Exceptional durability and ruggedness
- 66W fast wired charging
- 15W wireless charging
- 5W reverse wireless charging
- Potentially better grip due to rugged design
- Likely lower display quality compared to M53
- Potentially less refined camera
- Bulkier and heavier design
- Software updates may be less frequent
Samsung Galaxy M53
- Brighter and potentially more vibrant display
- Likely better camera performance
- Sleek and stylish design
- Samsung's One UI software experience
- Potentially better software support and updates
- Slower charging speed (25W)
- Less durable than Power Armor 18
- No rugged features
- May be more prone to damage from drops or water
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy M53 boasts a significantly brighter display (802 nits vs. unknown for Ulefone), offering better visibility in sunlight. While the M53 advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a nominal value), the overall viewing experience is likely superior due to the higher brightness and potentially better color accuracy. The Power Armor 18 likely prioritizes durability over display quality.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy M53 is expected to have a more advanced camera system, likely with better image processing and features. While specific camera specs are missing for the Power Armor 18, Samsung generally excels in camera performance. Expect better low-light performance and video quality from the M53.
Performance
Both phones share the same Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset and CPU configuration, suggesting similar performance in everyday tasks and gaming. However, Samsung's software optimization might provide a slightly smoother experience. The Power Armor 18's rugged design might introduce some thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both phones have impressive battery life, with the Galaxy M53 claiming an endurance rating of 114 hours. The Power Armor 18's 66W wired charging is a major advantage, allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the M53's 25W. The Power Armor 18 also offers 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Power Armor 18 is ideal for outdoor enthusiasts, construction workers, or anyone needing a phone that can survive drops, dust, and water. The Samsung Galaxy M53 is perfect for users prioritizing a large, bright display, a generally good camera, and a more refined software experience.