Ulefone Power Armor 16S vs. Blackview BV9200: A Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users prioritizing speed and convenience, the Blackview BV9200 is the stronger choice. Its Helio G96 chipset offers a noticeable performance edge, and the 66W wired and 30W wireless charging are game-changers for minimizing downtime. However, the Ulefone 16S remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 16S | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 14 | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 14 | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 173.4 x 83.4 x 18.3 mm (6.83 x 3.28 x 0.72 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 406 g (14.32 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.93 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~62.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (122-decibel) | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 9600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black/Orange | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 60 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Ulefone Power Armor 16S
- More affordable price point
- Rugged build quality
- Reverse wireless charging (albeit slow)
- Slower processor
- Slower charging speeds
- Display specifications unknown, likely inferior
Blackview BV9200
- Faster and more efficient processor
- Significantly faster wired and wireless charging
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Higher price
- Rugged build quality may not be significantly better than Ulefone
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 boasts a measured peak brightness of 481 nits and a 1423:1 contrast ratio, suggesting a more vibrant and visible display, particularly outdoors. While the Ulefone 16S’s display specifications are not provided, Blackview’s numbers indicate a superior viewing experience in direct sunlight. The contrast ratio is particularly important for readability of maps or schematics in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests standard refresh rates, meaning neither will offer adaptive power saving on the display.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the BV9200 will have more processing power dedicated to image processing, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The presence of a larger sensor (likely, given the chipset) in the BV9200 would further enhance low-light performance. It's reasonable to assume both phones include standard features like HDR, but the BV9200’s superior processing capabilities will likely deliver more refined results.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Blackview BV9200’s MediaTek Helio G96, with its 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, represents a step up in CPU performance compared to the Ulefone 16S’s Unisoc Tiger T616 (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75). The Cortex-A76 architecture is more efficient and powerful than the A75, translating to snappier app loading and smoother multitasking. While both are 12nm chips, the G96’s GPU is also more capable, offering a better experience for mobile gaming. The Ulefone 16S will handle basic tasks adequately, but the BV9200 is the clear winner for power users.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the charging capabilities are a major differentiator. The Blackview BV9200’s 66W wired charging and 30W wireless charging are significantly faster than the Ulefone 16S’s 18W wired and 5W reverse wired. This means the BV9200 can go from 0-100% in a fraction of the time, a critical advantage for users who need to minimize downtime. The inclusion of wireless charging on the BV9200 adds another layer of convenience, while the 5W reverse wired charging on the Ulefone 16S is limited to emergency top-ups for small accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 16S if you need a highly durable phone with a focus on cost-effectiveness and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications. It's ideal for basic communication and task management in harsh environments. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you prioritize performance for tasks like navigation, photography, or light gaming, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging – both wired and wireless – to keep you connected on the go.