Ulefone Power Armor 14 vs. Nokia XR20: A Rugged Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Nokia XR20 is the better choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 chipset, built on an 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Ulefone’s MediaTek Helio G35, despite both offering similar charging capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 14 | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 15 | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 15 | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 175.6 x 82.5 x 17.2 mm (6.91 x 3.25 x 0.68 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 358.2 g (12.63 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~70.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 20 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.78", 1.0µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 15W wireless | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 10000 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Ulefone Power Armor 14
- Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful chipset
- Rugged design for demanding environments
- Wireless charging support
- Significantly slower performance compared to the XR20
- Older chipset architecture
- Likely inferior camera image processing
Nokia XR20
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 480 chipset
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Modern CPU architecture for better longevity
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy use
- Rugged design may add bulk
- Price may be slightly higher
Display Comparison
Neither Ulefone nor Nokia provide display specs beyond resolution in their marketing. However, given the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The real difference lies beneath the surface. The XR20’s Snapdragon 480 has an integrated ISP capable of better image signal processing, potentially improving photo quality even with similar sensor hardware. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, prioritizing durability over a sleek aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 480’s ISP gives the Nokia XR20 an edge in image processing. The XR20 can likely handle more complex scenes and deliver better dynamic range. The Ulefone, while potentially having a similar megapixel count, will likely struggle with noise reduction and detail preservation in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of OIS on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for video recording.
Performance
The core differentiator is the chipset. The Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) significantly outperforms the Ulefone Power Armor 14’s MediaTek Helio G35 (12nm). The 8nm process node allows for greater transistor density and improved thermal efficiency, meaning the XR20 is less likely to throttle under sustained load. While both CPUs feature octa-core configurations, the Snapdragon’s Kryo 460 cores offer a more modern architecture and higher clock speeds (2x2.0 GHz vs 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53), resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The G35’s Cortex-A53 cores are older and less efficient.
Battery Life
Both devices support 18W wired charging and 15W wireless charging. The actual battery capacity isn’t specified, but the Ulefone Power Armor 14, with its less demanding chipset, will likely achieve longer battery life in real-world usage. However, the XR20’s more efficient processor means it won’t drain the battery as quickly during active use. The difference in charging speed is negligible, with both taking approximately 2-3 hours for a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 14 if you need maximum battery life and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calls, texts, and light app usage. Its lower processing demands translate to potentially longer runtimes. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, especially when multitasking or using 5G connectivity, and value a more modern chipset architecture for longevity.