Ulefone Power Armor 13 vs. Power Armor 19T: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Power Armor 19T edges out the 13 thanks to its significantly faster charging, more efficient chipset, and slightly improved performance. While the 13 boasts exceptional battery endurance, the 19T's overall package makes it the more compelling option for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 13 | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 22 | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 26 | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 492 g (1.08 lb) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | - | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 13200 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 296h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.3 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Exceptional battery life
- Rugged and durable design
- Reverse wireless charging
- Older chipset
- Slower charging
- Limited camera details
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Faster charging (66W wired)
- More efficient chipset (Helio G99)
- Improved performance
- Rugged and durable design
- Battery life not as extreme as 13
- Wireless charging slower (15W)
- Limited camera details
Display Comparison
Both phones feature robust displays designed to withstand harsh conditions. While the Armor 13 boasts a high contrast ratio of 1306:1, brightness is measured at 401 nits. The Armor 19T likely has a similar display quality, but specific brightness data is unavailable. Both are likely LCD panels, prioritizing durability over OLED vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are listed as 'Photo / Video' for both devices, indicating a lack of detailed information. Based on general knowledge, the Armor 19T's newer chipset likely provides slightly better image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in marginally improved photo and video quality. However, both are likely to offer decent, but not exceptional, camera performance.
Performance
The Armor 19T holds a clear advantage here. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset (6nm) is significantly more efficient and powerful than the Armor 13's Helio G95 (12nm). The G99 offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking and gaming. The 19T's newer architecture also contributes to improved power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Armor 13's endurance rating of 296h is incredibly impressive, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Armor 19T, while still offering good battery life, doesn't match this figure. However, the 19T compensates with significantly faster 66W wired charging (52% in 30 minutes), making it much quicker to top up.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Power Armor 13 is ideal for users prioritizing extreme battery life above all else and who don't need the absolute latest performance. The Power Armor 19T is better suited for those who want a balance of ruggedness, performance, and fast charging, and appreciate a more modern chipset.