Ulefone Power Armor 13 vs. Power Armor 18T: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Power Armor 18T is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster Dimensity 900 chipset and much quicker 66W charging. While the 13 offers impressive battery endurance, the 18T's overall performance and charging speed make it the superior choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 13 | Ulefone Power Armor 18T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 22 | 2022, October 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 26 | Available. Released 2022, October 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 492 g (1.08 lb) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | - | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 13200 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 640 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 296h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.3 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Exceptional battery life
- Rugged and durable design
- Good value for money
- High contrast ratio display
- Older chipset (Helio G95)
- Slower charging speeds
- Limited camera details
- Potentially less responsive performance
Ulefone Power Armor 18T
- Faster chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Significantly faster charging (66W)
- More modern design
- Improved performance
- Potentially shorter battery life than 13
- Likely higher price
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
Both phones feature ruggedized displays, likely with Corning Gorilla Glass protection. The Power Armor 13 boasts a contrast ratio of 1306:1, which is impressive, and a measured brightness of 401 nits. The 18T's display details are less readily available, but it likely offers comparable brightness and durability. The 13's contrast ratio suggests potentially better image quality, but real-world usage will depend on panel technology.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are listed as 'Photo / Video' for both devices, indicating limited detailed information. Based on general Ulefone trends, both likely feature multiple rear cameras (wide, macro, depth) and a front-facing camera for selfies. The 18T's more powerful chipset *could* allow for slightly better image processing, but without specific megapixel counts and sensor sizes, a definitive comparison is difficult. Expect decent, but not exceptional, camera performance from both.
Performance
This is where the Power Armor 18T shines. Its Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Power Armor 13's Helio G95 (12nm). The Dimensity 900 offers significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The 13 is adequate for everyday tasks, but the 18T provides a noticeably more responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Power Armor 13 boasts an incredible endurance rating of 296 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Power Armor 18T, while having a slightly smaller battery capacity (estimated around 6000mAh vs 8000mAh), benefits from the Dimensity 900's efficiency. While it may not match the 13's endurance, it still offers excellent battery life, and the 66W wired charging significantly reduces charging times.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Power Armor 13 is ideal for users prioritizing extreme battery life and a slightly lower price point. It's a solid choice for those who need a dependable, rugged phone for extended periods away from power. The Ulefone Power Armor 18T is better suited for users who value performance, faster charging, and a more modern chipset, even if it means sacrificing a bit of battery longevity.