Ulefone Power Armor 13 vs Armor 17 Pro: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro emerges as the clear winner, thanks to its significantly faster charging, more efficient chipset, and likely improved camera performance. While the Power Armor 13 offers exceptional battery endurance, the 17 Pro's upgrades make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 13 | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 22 | 2022, October 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 26 | Available. Released 2022, October 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 492 g (1.08 lb) | 290 g (10.23 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | - | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | MagSafe compatible accessories | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed |
| Type | Li-Po 13200 mAh | Li-Po 5380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 296h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.3 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Exceptional battery life
- Rugged and durable design
- Reverse wireless charging
- Older chipset
- Slower charging
- Potentially outdated camera
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Faster charging (66W wired)
- More efficient chipset (Helio G99)
- Likely improved camera performance
- Wireless charging
- Battery life not as exceptional as PA13
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature robust displays designed to withstand impacts. While the Power Armor 13 boasts a high contrast ratio of 1306:1, details on the Armor 17 Pro's display are scarce. Expect both to be bright enough for outdoor use, but the Armor 17 Pro *may* have a slightly improved panel given its newer design. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for both devices. However, the Armor 17 Pro's newer chipset and likely improved image processing should result in better photo and video quality. Expect improved low-light performance and potentially more advanced features on the 17 Pro. Both likely feature multiple rear cameras (wide, macro, depth).
Performance
The Armor 17 Pro's Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) chipset is a significant upgrade over the Power Armor 13's Helio G95 (12nm). The 6nm process offers better power efficiency and improved performance. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Armor 17 Pro. The CPU clock speeds are also slightly higher on the 17 Pro.
Battery Life
The Power Armor 13's standout feature is its incredible 296h endurance rating. This suggests exceptional battery life. The Armor 17 Pro, while likely still offering good battery life, doesn't match this figure. However, the Armor 17 Pro compensates with 66W wired charging, allowing for significantly faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Power Armor 13 is ideal for users prioritizing extreme battery life above all else and who don't need the latest performance. The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro is better suited for those who want a balance of ruggedness, performance, and faster charging, and appreciate a more modern chipset.