Ulefone Power Armor 13 vs Samsung Galaxy A54: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 offers a superior overall experience with its brighter display, faster processor, and better camera. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 13 excels in durability and boasts incredible battery life, making it ideal for those needing a tough and long-lasting device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Power Armor 13 | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 22 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 26 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 492 g (1.08 lb) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Penta | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | - | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 13200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | - | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 296h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.3 LUFS (Average) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Exceptional battery life
- Rugged and durable design
- Reverse wireless charging
- Affordable price
- Lower performance than A54
- Less impressive camera
- Lower screen brightness
- Less refined software
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster processor
- Better camera quality
- Sleek design
- Good software support
- Less durable than Power Armor 13
- Shorter battery life (in active use)
- Slower charging speeds (wired)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its 980 nits peak brightness is significantly higher than the Power Armor 13's 401 nits, making it much easier to see in direct sunlight. While the Power Armor 13 boasts a high 1306:1 contrast ratio, the A54's 'infinite' contrast ratio (typically indicative of OLED technology) provides richer blacks and more vibrant colors. The A54 also likely has better color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Samsung Galaxy A54 is expected to deliver significantly better image quality. Samsung's image processing is generally superior, and the A54 likely features a higher-resolution main sensor and more advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The Power Armor 13's camera is likely adequate for basic photography, but won't compete with the A54's capabilities.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 chipset, built on a 5nm process, is considerably more powerful than the Ulefone Power Armor 13's Helio G95 (12nm). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The A54's Cortex-A78 cores also offer a significant performance boost over the Power Armor 13's Cortex-A76 cores.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Power Armor 13's endurance rating of 296h is astonishing, suggesting exceptional battery life. However, this is a theoretical rating. The Galaxy A54's active use score of 11:15h is a more realistic measure, and while lower than the theoretical Power Armor 13 rating, it's still respectable. The Power Armor 13 also offers 33W wired, 15W wireless, and 5W reverse wireless charging, providing versatility.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Power Armor 13 is perfect for outdoor enthusiasts, construction workers, or anyone needing a phone that can withstand harsh conditions. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a great choice for everyday users who prioritize a sleek design, smooth performance, and a quality camera system.