Ulefone Power Armor 13 vs. Note 6T: A Deep Dive into Ruggedness and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and longevity, the Ulefone Power Armor 13 is the clear winner. Its Helio G95 chipset and 33W fast charging significantly outperform the Note 6T’s Helio A22. However, if absolute cost is the primary concern, the Note 6T offers a functional smartphone experience at a lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Note 6T | Ulefone Power Armor 13 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 13 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 13 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 155.4 x 73.4 x 8.5 mm (6.12 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 492 g (1.08 lb) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | - |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| - | Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 3300 mAh | Li-Po 13200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple, Red | Black |
| Price | - | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 296h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Note 6T
- Significantly lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Lightweight and potentially more pocketable
- Weak processor struggles with demanding apps
- No fast or wireless charging
- Likely inferior camera performance
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Powerful Helio G95 processor for smooth performance
- 33W fast charging and wireless charging capabilities
- Ruggedized design for enhanced durability
- Higher price compared to the Note 6T
- Bulkier and heavier due to rugged construction
- May be overkill for users with basic needs
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1306:1, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Power Armor 13 boasts a measured peak brightness of 401 nits, which will provide better visibility outdoors compared to the Note 6T, whose brightness is not specified. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels given the price points, the Armor 13’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the market positioning, expect the Power Armor 13 to have a more capable camera system, potentially with a larger sensor and improved image processing. The Note 6T likely features a basic camera setup sufficient for casual snapshots. Without sensor size or aperture information, a detailed comparison is impossible, but the G95’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) will contribute to better image quality on the Power Armor 13.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Ulefone Note 6T’s MediaTek Helio A22, with its quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU, is designed for basic tasks. In contrast, the Power Armor 13’s Helio G95 features an octa-core configuration (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The G95’s Cortex-A76 cores represent a significant architectural leap, offering substantially improved single-core and multi-core performance, making the Power Armor 13 far more capable of handling demanding apps, gaming, and multitasking. The G95 also benefits from a more modern GPU, further widening the performance divide.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 296 hours, suggesting similar battery life under identical usage conditions. However, the Power Armor 13’s charging capabilities are vastly superior. It supports 33W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, and even 5W reverse wireless charging – features entirely absent on the Note 6T. This means the Power Armor 13 can be rapidly recharged and can even act as a power bank for other devices, offering significant convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Note 6T if you need a basic, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and aren't concerned with demanding applications or long-term performance. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 13 if you work in challenging environments, require a rugged device capable of withstanding drops and water exposure, and value faster processing speeds, wireless charging, and a more future-proof experience.