Ulefone Armor 9E vs. Note 6T: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Ruggedness
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Ulefone Armor 9E is the superior choice. Its Helio P90 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the Note 6T’s Helio A22, making it suitable for more demanding tasks. However, the Note 6T remains a viable option for those prioritizing absolute affordability and minimal requirements.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Note 6T | Ulefone Armor 9E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 13 | 2020, September 08. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 13 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 155.4 x 73.4 x 8.5 mm (6.12 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm (6.62 x 3.23 x 0.59 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 324 g (11.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| - | Endoscope mount (camera sold separately) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3300 mAh | Li-Po 6600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple, Red | Black |
| Price | - | About 290 EUR |
Ulefone Note 6T
- Lower price point makes it highly accessible.
- Simpler software experience may appeal to basic users.
- Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding processor (depending on battery capacity).
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Armor 9E.
- Limited multitasking capabilities.
- Inferior camera performance, especially in low light.
Ulefone Armor 9E
- Much faster performance thanks to the Helio P90 chipset.
- 18W fast charging for quicker power-ups.
- Improved camera processing for better image quality.
- Higher price compared to the Note 6T.
- Ruggedized design may be bulkier than standard smartphones.
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load (depending on battery capacity).
Display Comparison
Neither Ulefone provides detailed display specifications beyond size. However, given the Note 6T’s positioning, it likely utilizes a standard IPS LCD panel. The Armor 9E, while also likely IPS, benefits from the more powerful chipset to potentially drive a higher resolution or refresh rate (though unconfirmed). The lack of information on brightness nits and color accuracy makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Armor 9E’s overall higher tier suggests a potentially more refined visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are absent, but the Armor 9E’s more powerful processor allows for more sophisticated image processing. While both phones likely feature a primary rear camera, the P90’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) will enable better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality. The Note 6T will likely struggle with low-light photography and complex scenes. Without sensor size information, it’s difficult to assess further, but the P90’s processing capabilities give the Armor 9E a clear advantage.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Ulefone Note 6T’s MediaTek Helio A22, with its quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU, is designed for basic tasks. In contrast, the Armor 9E’s Helio P90 features an octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The Cortex-A75 cores in the P90 represent a substantial architectural leap, offering significantly improved single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and the ability to handle more demanding applications. The P90’s integrated GPU also provides a much better gaming experience.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Armor 9E’s inclusion of 18W wired charging is a significant advantage. The Note 6T likely supports standard 5W or 10W charging, resulting in considerably longer charge times. While a larger battery capacity on the Note 6T could partially offset the slower charging, the Armor 9E’s faster charging allows for quicker top-ups and reduced downtime, making it more convenient for active users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Note 6T if you need a basic, affordable smartphone for calls, texts, and light social media use, and don't require significant processing power. Buy the Ulefone Armor 9E if you prioritize durability, faster performance for apps and multitasking, and the convenience of 18W fast charging, even at a higher price point.