Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Ulefone Note 6T and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Note 6T edges out the A03 Core thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and potentially better overall performance. However, Samsung's brand recognition and One UI offer a smoother user experience for some. It's a close call, depending on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 13 | 2021, November 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 13 | Available. Released 2021, December 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 155.4 x 73.4 x 8.5 mm (6.12 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 3300 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple, Red | Black, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A032F, SM-A032F/DS, SM-A032M |
| Price | - | £ 74.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.30 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.24 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) |
Ulefone Note 6T
- More powerful chipset
- Larger display (typically)
- Potentially better camera features (depth sensor)
- Competitive price
- Less established brand
- Potentially less software support
- Slower charging
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Samsung brand reliability
- One UI interface (potentially smoother)
- Good software support (typically)
- Widely available
- Less powerful chipset
- Smaller display (typically)
- Slower performance
- Basic camera features
Display Comparison
The Ulefone Note 6T typically features a larger display (around 6.53 inches) compared to the A03 Core (around 6.5 inches). Both likely use IPS LCD panels with HD+ resolution. While both are adequate, the Note 6T's slightly larger size might offer a more immersive viewing experience, though pixel density will be similar.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is often a weak point in budget phones. The Ulefone Note 6T likely features a multi-lens setup (13MP main + depth sensor), while the A03 Core typically has a single 13MP main camera. Image quality will be comparable in good lighting, but the Note 6T's depth sensor *might* offer slightly better portrait mode results. Low-light performance will be mediocre on both.
Performance
Here's where the Ulefone Note 6T has a clear advantage. Its Mediatek Helio A22 chipset, built on a 12nm process, generally outperforms the Unisoc SC9863A (28nm) in the A03 Core. The A22's quad-core 2.0 GHz CPU offers a noticeable speed boost for everyday tasks and light gaming. The A03 Core's octa-core setup, while having more cores, doesn't translate to significantly better real-world performance.
Battery Life
Both phones typically offer a large battery capacity (around 5000mAh). Battery life should be similar, providing a full day of moderate use. Charging speeds are likely to be slow on both devices, typically around 10W.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Note 6T is ideal for users prioritizing performance and a larger display on a tight budget. The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a good choice for those who value brand reliability, a simpler interface, and potentially better software support, even if it means sacrificing a bit of power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Ulefone Note 6T's Helio A22 chipset generally provides better gaming performance than the A03 Core's Unisoc SC9863A, although both are best suited for casual games.
❓ How long will the battery last on each phone?
Both phones typically offer all-day battery life with moderate usage thanks to their 5000mAh batteries. Actual battery life will vary depending on usage patterns.