Ulefone Note 6T vs. Blackview BV8800: A Deep Dive into Budget Rugged Phones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Blackview BV8800 is the superior choice. Its Helio G96 chipset provides significantly faster performance than the Note 6T’s Helio A22, making it better suited for gaming and demanding applications. While both offer similar battery endurance, the BV8800’s 33W charging is a substantial advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Note 6T | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 13 | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 13 | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 155.4 x 73.4 x 8.5 mm (6.12 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3300 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple, Red | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Note 6T
- Extremely affordable price point
- Decent battery endurance (199h)
- Rugged design for basic protection
- Weak processor (Helio A22)
- Limited performance for gaming and multitasking
- Charging speed likely slow
Blackview BV8800
- Powerful processor (Helio G96)
- Fast 33W charging (0-100% in 90 mins)
- Good display brightness (501 nits)
- Higher price than Ulefone Note 6T
- Similar battery endurance to Note 6T
- Camera specs lack detail
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1348:1, suggesting similar color reproduction capabilities. However, the Blackview BV8800 boasts a measured peak brightness of 501 nits, which will provide better visibility outdoors compared to the Ulefone Note 6T, whose brightness is not specified. The lack of information on the Note 6T’s panel type makes it difficult to assess its viewing angles or color accuracy, but given its price point, it likely utilizes a simpler IPS panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, the BV8800’s more powerful chipset suggests it will have superior image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The presence of a dedicated image signal processor (ISP) within the Helio G96 will contribute to faster image capture and improved noise reduction. The Ulefone Note 6T’s Helio A22 lacks the advanced features found in the G96, limiting its camera performance.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The Blackview BV8800’s Mediatek Helio G96, with its octa-core CPU (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), is a significant upgrade over the Ulefone Note 6T’s quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 processor based on the Helio A22. The G96’s Cortex-A76 cores offer considerably higher single-core performance, crucial for app responsiveness, while the additional cores improve multitasking capabilities. This translates to smoother operation, faster app loading times, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the BV8800.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 199 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Blackview BV8800’s 33W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 31% charge in just 30 minutes and fully charge in 90 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. The Ulefone Note 6T’s charging speed is not specified, but it’s likely to be considerably slower, making the BV8800 the more convenient option for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Note 6T if you need an extremely affordable smartphone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media use, and aren't concerned with gaming or demanding apps. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you prioritize performance, faster charging, and a more responsive user experience, even if it means spending a bit more. The BV8800 is ideal for users who need a rugged phone for outdoor work or activities.