The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Ulefone Note 6P and Xiaomi Redmi 10C represent two distinct approaches to delivering value. The Note 6P relies on a Unisoc chipset to keep costs down, while the Redmi 10C leverages Qualcomm's Snapdragon 680. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Redmi 10C is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a more efficient 6nm process, delivers significantly better performance and responsiveness than the Ulefone Note 6P’s Unisoc SC9863A. While the Note 6P may offer a slightly different feature set, the Redmi 10C’s performance advantage is too significant to ignore.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 25 | 2022, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 25 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 155.4 x 73.4 x 8.5 mm (6.12 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 169.6 x 76.6 x 8.3 mm (6.68 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 155 g (5.47 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple, Red | Graphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint Green |
| Models | - | 220333QAG, 220333QBI, 220333QNY, 220333QL |
| Price | About 90 EUR | £ 99.00 / € 109.86 |
| SAR | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
Ulefone Note 6P
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- May offer unique software customizations
- Compact size may appeal to some users
- Significantly weaker performance due to Unisoc chipset
- Less efficient 28nm process
- Likely inferior camera performance
- No specified fast charging
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 680
- More efficient 6nm process
- 18W fast charging
- Larger 5000mAh battery
- Qualcomm ISP for better image processing
- Larger size may not suit all users
- May be slightly more expensive than the Note 6P
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. However, details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable. The Redmi 10C’s larger screen size (6.53” vs. the Note 6P’s 6.1”) offers a more immersive viewing experience, though this comes at the cost of one-handed usability. Without specific display specs, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the larger screen of the Redmi 10C is a practical advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Details on sensor sizes and image processing are limited. However, the Redmi 10C’s camera system is likely to benefit from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which offers superior noise reduction and dynamic range compared to the ISP found in the Unisoc chipset. While neither phone will challenge flagship camera performance, the Redmi 10C is expected to deliver more consistently pleasing results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The prevalence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both devices suggests limited utility for serious photography.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Xiaomi Redmi 10C’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Ulefone Note 6P’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). The 6nm process node translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, allowing the Snapdragon 680 to sustain higher clock speeds for longer. The CPU architecture also favors the Redmi 10C; its Kryo 265 Gold cores (2.4 GHz) are considerably faster than the Cortex-A55 cores (1.6 GHz) in the Note 6P. This difference will be noticeable in app loading times, multitasking, and gaming. The Redmi 10C will handle demanding apps and games with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Redmi 10C includes 18W wired charging, a feature absent from the available specifications for the Ulefone Note 6P. While battery capacity isn’t specified for the Note 6P, the Redmi 10C packs a 5000mAh battery. The combination of a more efficient chipset and a larger battery gives the Redmi 10C a clear advantage in battery life. The 18W charging will also allow for faster top-ups, reducing downtime. Users prioritizing all-day battery life and quick charging will strongly favor the Redmi 10C.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Note 6P if you prioritize a potentially unique software experience or specific regional availability and are willing to compromise on performance. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10C if you value smooth everyday use, better gaming capabilities, and the reliability of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon platform. The Redmi 10C is the better all-rounder for most users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi 10C’s Snapdragon 680 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 680 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with playable frame rates. While it won’t deliver a flagship gaming experience, it provides a significantly smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience than the Ulefone Note 6P’s Unisoc SC9863A.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Redmi 10C a significant advantage?
Yes, the 18W charging is a notable benefit. While not the fastest charging available, it will significantly reduce charging times compared to a phone without fast charging support. Expect a full charge in approximately 2-3 hours, depending on usage.
❓ How does the Unisoc SC9863A in the Ulefone Note 6P perform with multitasking?
Multitasking with the Ulefone Note 6P will likely be sluggish, especially with multiple demanding apps open simultaneously. The Unisoc SC9863A’s limited processing power and RAM management will result in noticeable lag and app reloading.
❓ Does the Redmi 10C support VoLTE and VoWiFi?
Support for VoLTE and VoWiFi varies by region and carrier. It's crucial to check compatibility with your specific carrier before purchasing the Redmi 10C to ensure you can utilize these features for improved call quality and connectivity.
