The Ulefone Note 6P and Oppo A57s represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone segment. While both aim to deliver essential functionality at a low price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing quick top-ups and slightly better overall responsiveness, the Oppo A57s is the stronger choice. Its MediaTek Helio G35, built on a more efficient 12nm process, and 33W charging provide a noticeable advantage over the Ulefone Note 6P’s older Unisoc SC9863A and slower charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 25 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 25 | Available. Released 2022, September 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 155.4 x 73.4 x 8.5 mm (6.12 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 155 g (5.47 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min |
| Type | Li-Po 3300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple, Red | Starry Black, Sky Blue |
| Models | - | CPH2385 |
| Price | About 90 EUR | - |
Ulefone Note 6P
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Lower price point (likely)
- Functional for basic tasks
- Older, less efficient Unisoc chipset
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely struggles with demanding apps
Oppo A57s
- More modern and efficient MediaTek Helio G35 chipset
- 33W fast charging (69 minutes to full)
- Better overall responsiveness
- Potentially shorter battery life (depending on capacity)
- Slightly higher price point
- Still a budget device with limitations
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Details regarding panel type, resolution, and brightness are absent from the provided data, suggesting both likely utilize basic LCD panels common in this price bracket. Bezels are expected to be noticeable on both. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a strong point, and neither is expected to feature high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor size or aperture information, a detailed camera comparison is limited. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary lenses (often 2MP) in this segment suggests image quality will be heavily reliant on the main sensor, and details on those are missing. Image processing will likely be basic on both devices, prioritizing speed over detail.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A57s’ MediaTek Helio G35, fabricated on a 12nm process, offers a significant architectural advantage over the Ulefone Note 6P’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). While both are octa-core, the Helio G35 utilizes Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz, compared to the Note 6P’s Cortex-A55 cores at 1.6 GHz and 1.2 GHz. This translates to faster processing speeds and improved efficiency for the Oppo A57s. The 12nm process also contributes to better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during sustained use. The Ulefone Note 6P will likely struggle with more demanding applications and multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the Oppo A57s’ 33W wired charging, capable of a full charge in 69 minutes, is a clear advantage. This significantly reduces downtime compared to the likely slower charging speeds of the Ulefone Note 6P. While the Note 6P might potentially have a slightly larger battery capacity, the A57s’ faster charging mitigates the impact of a smaller battery, offering more convenient usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Note 6P if you prioritize maximizing battery life on a very tight budget and aren't demanding in terms of app performance. It's a solid option for basic communication and light tasks. Buy the Oppo A57s if you value faster charging, a more responsive user experience, and are willing to spend a little more for a more modern chipset, even if it means slightly less battery longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G35 in the Oppo A57s handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio G35 is a basic gaming chipset. PUBG Mobile will likely be playable at low to medium settings with reduced frame rates. Don't expect a smooth, high-fidelity gaming experience, but it's capable of casual gaming.
❓ Is the Unisoc SC9863A in the Ulefone Note 6P sufficient for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the Unisoc SC9863A is adequate for basic tasks like web browsing, social media, and messaging. However, expect some lag and slowdowns when multitasking or running more demanding apps. It's best suited for users with minimal smartphone requirements.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo A57s compared to a standard 10W charger?
33W charging is significantly faster. A standard 10W charger could take 3-4 hours to fully charge the phone, while the Oppo A57s reaches 100% in just 69 minutes. This makes a huge difference in convenience, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
