Ulefone Note 20 Pro vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025): A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life, the Ulefone Note 20 Pro is the clear winner. However, if you value a snappier user experience and faster charging, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) offers a compelling upgrade, despite its shorter battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Note 20 Pro | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2025, April 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2025, April 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.8 x 77.4 x 9.1 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.36 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Satin Black, Ribbons White | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web |
| Models | - | XT2517-1 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 61:18h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (112 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Note 20 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (61:18h endurance)
- Potentially longer battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Slower processor (Unisoc T606)
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Likely less vibrant display
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- Faster and more efficient processor (Snapdragon 6 Gen 3)
- Significantly brighter display (1870 nits)
- Faster charging (68W wired, 15W wireless)
- Shorter battery life (10:05h active use)
- Potentially higher price
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1870 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we'd expect from the Ulefone Note 20 Pro, making the Motorola far more usable in direct sunlight. While the Ulefone's panel specs are unavailable, the Motorola's brightness alone suggests a superior viewing experience, particularly outdoors. The Motorola's display tech is likely more advanced, potentially including features like higher refresh rates (not specified but common in this segment) that contribute to smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Ulefone Note 20 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, offering improved image processing capabilities. While sensor size and aperture data are missing for both, the Motorola’s chipset suggests better low-light performance and dynamic range. It's reasonable to assume the Motorola will deliver more consistent and higher-quality photos and videos, especially given the trend of improved camera tech in Motorola's mid-range offerings.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm), a considerable step up from the Ulefone Note 20 Pro’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 utilizes a more efficient 4nm process, resulting in better thermal management and sustained performance. Its octa-core CPU, featuring 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, provides a noticeable performance boost over the Ulefone’s 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The Ulefone will handle basic tasks adequately, but the Motorola is designed for a more demanding user.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Note 20 Pro claims an impressive 61:18h endurance, backed by a 1000-cycle battery lifespan claim. This suggests a focus on long-term battery health and extended usage between charges. However, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) compensates for its 10:05h active use score with significantly faster charging: 68W wired and 15W wireless. The Ulefone is limited to 18W wired charging. This means the Motorola can replenish its battery much more quickly, mitigating the shorter overall endurance. The convenience of wireless charging is also exclusive to the Motorola.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Note 20 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last two days on a single charge, and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday tasks and gaming, and appreciate the convenience of 68W fast charging and wireless charging capabilities.