Ulefone Note 20 Pro vs. Google Pixel 6a: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life, the Ulefone Note 20 Pro is the clear winner, boasting a remarkable 61:18h endurance. However, the Google Pixel 6a offers a significantly more powerful processor and a superior camera experience, making it the better choice for performance-focused users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Note 20 Pro | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.8 x 77.4 x 9.1 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.36 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm 2 MP (macro) | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Satin Black, Ribbons White | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | - | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 110 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 61:18h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (112 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Note 20 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (61:18h endurance)
- Potentially longer battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
- More affordable price point
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Likely inferior camera quality
- Limited display specifications
Google Pixel 6a
- Powerful Google Tensor chipset
- Excellent camera with Google’s image processing
- Bright and vibrant OLED display
- Shorter battery life compared to Ulefone
- Higher price
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 876 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Ulefone Note 20 Pro. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. The Pixel 6a’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels, provides deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. While the Ulefone’s display specs are limited, the Pixel 6a’s superior panel technology offers a demonstrably better viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, the Pixel 6a benefits from Google’s renowned computational photography. The Pixel 6a’s image processing algorithms excel at dynamic range, noise reduction, and detail preservation. Without specific sensor details for the Ulefone Note 20 Pro, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the Pixel 6a’s software advantage is significant. The Ulefone’s camera is likely adequate for casual snapshots, but the Pixel 6a will consistently deliver higher-quality images, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) is a flagship-level processor, featuring a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.80 GHz, alongside A76 and A55 cores. This architecture delivers substantially higher performance than the Ulefone Note 20 Pro’s Unisoc T606 (12nm), which utilizes Cortex-A75 and A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor chip also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under sustained load. The Pixel 6a will handle demanding tasks and games with ease, while the Ulefone Note 20 Pro is better suited for everyday use.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Note 20 Pro’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 61:18h. This is significantly longer than the Pixel 6a’s 94h rating. While the Pixel 6a’s endurance is still respectable, the Ulefone’s advantage is substantial. Both phones support 18W wired charging, but the Pixel 6a adds PD3.0 support for potentially faster charging with compatible chargers. The Ulefone’s claim of 1000 charge cycles suggests a focus on long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Note 20 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and you prioritize battery life above all else. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value a smooth, responsive user experience, excellent camera capabilities, and access to Google’s latest software features, even if it means more frequent charging.