The Ulefone Note 19 and Oppo A17k represent two distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The Ulefone prioritizes longevity with a massive battery, while the Oppo A17k aims for a slightly more responsive experience with a newer, albeit still entry-level, chipset. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and potentially multi-day) battery life, the Ulefone Note 19 is the clear winner. Its exceptional 45:51h endurance significantly outweighs the Oppo A17k’s marginally faster processor, especially given both phones target similar basic usage scenarios.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2022, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2022, October 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.2 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IPX4 water resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 8x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T603 (22 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8322 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 14 (Go edition) | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Navy Blue, Gold |
| Models | - | CPH2471 |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 45:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (124 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Ulefone Note 19
- Exceptional battery life (45:51h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1000 cycles)
- Efficient Cortex-A55 architecture
- Slower processor compared to Oppo A17k
- Less efficient 22nm fabrication process
- Slow 10W charging
Oppo A17k
- Slightly faster processor for basic tasks
- More modern chipset (Helio G35)
- Potentially smoother UI responsiveness
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Less efficient power consumption
- Likely lower battery cycle count
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Details are missing, but given the price point, expect 720p+ resolution LCD panels. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity. However, the difference in chipsets *could* impact display responsiveness; the Oppo A17k’s Helio G35 might offer slightly smoother scrolling due to its higher clock speeds, but this is unlikely to be dramatic.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature basic camera setups. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume both rely on budget sensors. The Oppo A17k’s camera performance will likely be marginally better due to the more modern chipset’s image signal processor (ISP), but don’t expect flagship-level results. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device should be considered marketing filler rather than genuinely useful features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A17k’s Mediatek Helio G35, fabricated on a 12nm process, features a split core configuration with 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This suggests a focus on burst performance for short tasks. Conversely, the Ulefone Note 19 utilizes the Unisoc T603 (22nm) with 8x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the clock speed is lower, the Cortex-A55 architecture is more efficient. The 22nm process is less efficient than 12nm, but the Ulefone's battery capacity mitigates this. For everyday tasks like browsing and social media, the difference will be minimal, but the Oppo may feel slightly more responsive in app switching.
Battery Life
This is where the Ulefone Note 19 truly shines. Its 45:51h endurance is exceptional for a budget phone, and the 1000 cycle rating suggests long-term battery health. The Oppo A17k’s battery capacity is unknown, but given the Helio G35’s power draw, it will almost certainly fall short of the Ulefone’s longevity. The 10W charging on the Ulefone is slow, but the massive battery capacity means you won’t need to charge it as frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Note 19 if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day of moderate use, or even longer for lighter tasks, and value battery life above all else. It’s ideal for travelers, field workers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from a charger. Buy the Oppo A17k if you prefer a slightly snappier interface for basic tasks and are willing to compromise on battery endurance, potentially needing a top-up charge before the end of a busy day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T603 in the Ulefone Note 19 struggle with multitasking?
While not a powerhouse, the Unisoc T603 with its 8 cores is capable of handling basic multitasking – switching between apps like messaging, browsing, and music playback. However, demanding tasks or running multiple resource-intensive apps simultaneously will likely result in slowdowns. It's designed for efficiency, not speed.
❓ Is the Helio G35 in the Oppo A17k sufficient for playing casual games?
The Helio G35 can handle less demanding casual games like puzzle games or simple arcade titles. However, it will struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty, even on low settings. Expect frame rate drops and potential lag.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Ulefone Note 19 with its 10W charger?
Given the large battery capacity and slow 10W charging, expect a full charge to take approximately 4-5 hours. While slow, the exceptional battery life means you won't need to charge it daily.
❓ Does the Oppo A17k support fast charging?
Details are limited, but given its budget positioning, it's unlikely the Oppo A17k supports fast charging. Expect a similar charging time to the Ulefone Note 19, potentially slightly faster, but still several hours for a full charge.
