The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Two contenders vying for your attention are the Ulefone Note 13P and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 emerges as the clear winner. While the Ulefone Note 13P is a budget option, the Redmi Note 10 boasts a significantly faster chipset, superior charging speeds, a brighter display, and a generally more polished experience, justifying its slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 24 | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 24 | Available. Released 2021, March 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 75.7 x 9.9 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.39 in) | 160.5 x 74.5 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 178.8 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant (market/region dependent) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 450 nits (typ), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM678 Snapdragon 678 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 20 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.78, 1.0µm, AF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.09, 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.09, 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 25 min, 100% in 74 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5180 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Mystery Blue | Shadow Black (Onyx Gray), Frost White (Pebble White), Aqua Green (Lake Green) |
| Models | - | M2101K7AI, M2101K7AG |
| Price | About 130 EUR | € 159.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 110h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 218788 (v8)
GeekBench: 2860 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Note 13P
- Very affordable
- Decent battery life
- Large display (likely)
- Slow performance
- Slow charging
- Lower display quality
- Less polished software
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
- Faster performance
- Fast charging (33W)
- Brighter and better display
- Better camera
- More refined software experience
- Slightly more expensive
- Battery life, while good, not dramatically better than Ulefone
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 10's display shines with a measured 682 nits of brightness, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Its infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Ulefone Note 13P's display is likely adequate but lacks the brightness and contrast of the Redmi Note 10, potentially impacting outdoor usability and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Redmi Note 10 generally has a reputation for better camera performance, particularly in well-lit conditions. Expect more detailed photos and better dynamic range. The Ulefone Note 13P's camera is likely adequate for basic snapshots but won't compete with the Redmi Note 10's image quality.
Performance
The Snapdragon 678 in the Redmi Note 10 provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Helio G35 in the Ulefone Note 13P. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user interface on the Redmi Note 10. The Ulefone Note 13P may struggle with demanding games or heavy applications.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive endurance ratings (110h). However, the Redmi Note 10's 33W fast charging is a significant advantage, allowing for much quicker top-ups compared to the Ulefone Note 13P's 10W charging. This means less time tethered to a charger.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Note 13P is ideal for users on an extremely tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and don't need high performance. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is a better choice for those seeking a smoother experience, faster charging, a better camera, and a brighter display, even if it means spending a little more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Ulefone Note 13P good for gaming?
The Ulefone Note 13P's Helio G35 chipset is not ideal for demanding games. You may experience lag and stuttering, especially in graphically intensive titles. The Redmi Note 10 offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The Redmi Note 10 takes approximately 74 minutes to fully charge with its 33W charger. The Ulefone Note 13P, with its 10W charger, will take significantly longer, likely around 2.5 - 3 hours.
