Ulefone Note 13P vs Xiaomi Poco F4: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco F4 is the clear winner. While the Ulefone Note 13P offers basic functionality, the Poco F4 boasts a significantly faster processor, superior display, blazing-fast charging, and a better camera system, making it the smarter choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Note 13P | Xiaomi Poco F4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 24 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 24 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 75.7 x 9.9 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.39 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 20 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.78, 1.0µm, AF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.09, 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.09, 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5180 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Mystery Blue | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | - | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 130 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Note 13P
- Very affordable
- Decent battery life (101h endurance rating)
- Basic functionality for calls and texts
- Slow processor (Helio G35)
- Low brightness display (likely)
- Slow charging (10W)
- Limited camera capabilities
- Unknown display technology
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 processor
- Bright and vibrant display (1003 nits)
- Fast 67W charging
- Excellent battery life (101h endurance rating)
- Superior camera system
- May lack some premium features
- Potentially less durable build compared to flagship devices
Display Comparison
The Poco F4's display is a major advantage. Its 1003 nits max brightness and infinite contrast ratio provide a vibrant and immersive viewing experience, far surpassing what the Note 13P likely offers (spec details are scarce, but it's safe to assume a standard, less bright display). The Poco F4's AMOLED panel (assumed) will also offer better colors and deeper blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Poco F4's camera system is expected to be considerably better. The Snapdragon 870 typically pairs with a more advanced camera setup, offering better image quality, dynamic range, and video recording capabilities. The Note 13P's camera is likely adequate for casual snapshots.
Performance
The Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4 is a powerhouse compared to the Helio G35 in the Note 13P. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a much better gaming experience on the Poco F4. The Note 13P will handle basic tasks adequately, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 101h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Poco F4's 67W charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 38 minutes, while the Note 13P's 10W charging is significantly slower.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Note 13P is best suited for users on an extremely tight budget who prioritize basic calling, texting, and light app usage. The Xiaomi Poco F4 is ideal for those who want a smooth, responsive experience for gaming, photography, and everyday tasks without breaking the bank.