Ulefone Note 13P vs Oppo A72: Which Budget Champion Reigns?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A72 generally wins due to its superior Snapdragon 665 chipset, faster charging, and often better camera performance. While the Ulefone Note 13P is a budget-friendly option, the A72 provides a smoother experience and more future-proof hardware.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Note 13P | Oppo A72 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 24 | 2020, April 21. Released 2020, April 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 24 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 75.7 x 9.9 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.39 in) | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 20 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.78, 1.0µm, AF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens 2 MP B/W, f/2.4 |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.09, 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.09, 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5180 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Mystery Blue | Twilight Black, Stream White, Sky Blue, Aurora Purple |
| Models | - | CPH2067 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.48 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) |
Ulefone Note 13P
- Very affordable
- Large battery
- Decent display for the price
- Slow charging
- Underpowered chipset
- Basic camera performance
Oppo A72
- Faster performance (Snapdragon 665)
- Faster charging (18W)
- Better camera
- Slightly better display
- More expensive than Ulefone Note 13P
- Still a budget phone with limitations
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, typically around 6.5 inches. The Oppo A72 often boasts a slightly higher resolution (typically FHD+) and potentially better color accuracy, though both are LCD panels. Viewing angles and brightness are generally adequate for their price range.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo A72 typically has a more versatile camera system, often including a higher resolution main sensor and potentially a dedicated ultrawide lens. Image processing is generally better on the Oppo, resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos. The Ulefone Note 13P's camera is adequate for casual snapshots but lacks the refinement of the Oppo.
Performance
The Oppo A72's Snapdragon 665 chipset is noticeably faster and more efficient than the Ulefone Note 13P's Helio G35. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Oppo A72. The Helio G35 is sufficient for basic tasks but can struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer large batteries (typically 5000mAh). However, the Oppo A72's 18W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the Ulefone Note 13P's 10W charging. Battery life itself is comparable between the two, lasting a full day with moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Note 13P is ideal for users on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and don't need high-end performance. The Oppo A72 is a better choice for those who want a smoother experience, faster charging, and a slightly better camera, even if it means spending a bit more.