Looking for a budget-friendly smartphone that doesn't compromise too much? The Ulefone Note 12 and Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro are both contenders, offering compelling features at accessible price points. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is the clear winner. While the Ulefone Note 12 offers basic functionality, the Poco X5 Pro boasts a significantly faster processor, superior display, blazing-fast charging, and a better camera system, making it the more well-rounded choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 173.6 x 79.1 x 10.2 mm (6.83 x 3.11 x 0.40 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 237 g (8.36 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~80.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 7700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Red, Blue | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | - | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Note 12
- Very affordable
- Decent battery life (113h endurance rating)
- Basic functionality
- Weak processor
- Slow charging (10W)
- Likely inferior display
- Unspecified camera quality
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G processor
- Fast 67W charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Excellent battery life (113h endurance rating)
- Reverse wired charging
- May be slightly more expensive than the Note 12
- Design might be less unique
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro's display is a major advantage. Its 912 nits max brightness and infinite contrast ratio (nominal) provide a vibrant and easily viewable screen, even in direct sunlight. The Note 12 likely has a standard, less bright display, making the Poco X5 Pro the clear winner for visual enjoyment.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Poco X5 Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality due to its more advanced chipset and likely better camera sensors. Expect better low-light performance, more detail, and improved video recording on the Poco X5 Pro. Specific camera specs are missing for the Note 12, further highlighting the Poco X5 Pro's advantage.
Performance
The Poco X5 Pro's Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset is significantly more powerful than the Ulefone Note 12's Unisoc Tiger T310. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Poco X5 Pro. The Poco X5 Pro's octa-core CPU also outperforms the Note 12's quad-core processor.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 113h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Poco X5 Pro's 67W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 45 minutes. The Note 12's 10W charging is considerably slower.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Note 12 is best suited for users on an extremely tight budget who prioritize basic calling, texting, and light app usage. The Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is ideal for those who want a smoother experience, better camera capabilities, faster charging, and a more premium feel without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Ulefone Note 12 good for gaming?
The Ulefone Note 12's processor is not ideal for demanding games. You'll likely experience lag and reduced performance. The Poco X5 Pro is a much better choice for gaming.
❓ How long does it take to charge the Poco X5 Pro?
The Poco X5 Pro charges incredibly fast with its 67W wired charging, reaching 100% in approximately 45 minutes.
❓ What is the difference between the chipsets?
The Poco X5 Pro uses a Snapdragon 778G 5G, a significantly more powerful and efficient chipset compared to the Ulefone Note 12's Unisoc Tiger T310. This translates to better performance across the board.
