Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. Today, we pit a rugged workhorse, the Ulefone Armor X9 Pro, against a refined mid-range champion, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G. This comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the clear winner overall, offering superior performance, a better display, and a more versatile camera. However, the Ulefone Armor X9 Pro excels in durability and affordability, making it ideal for those needing a tough, budget-friendly device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 21/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 07 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 07 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158 x 77.5 x 13.9 mm (6.22 x 3.05 x 0.55 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 235 g (8.29 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m
MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~293 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~63.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Red, Black, Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | - | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 160 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Ulefone Armor X9 Pro
- Extremely durable and rugged
- Affordable price
- Long battery life
- Water and dust resistant
- Low performance
- Basic display
- Limited camera capabilities
- Slow charging
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Excellent performance
- Bright and vibrant display
- Versatile camera system
- Fast charging
- 5G connectivity
- More expensive
- Less rugged than Armor X9 Pro
- Battery life, while good, not significantly better than Armor X9 Pro
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display (800 nits) with an 'infinite' contrast ratio, providing vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Armor X9 Pro's display is adequate but lacks the same level of brightness and color accuracy. The A52s 5G also supports a 120Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A52s 5G's camera system is more versatile and produces higher-quality photos and videos. While the Armor X9 Pro has a functional camera, it struggles in low-light conditions and lacks the advanced features of the A52s 5G. The A52s 5G likely includes features like OIS (Optical Image Stabilization).
Performance
The Snapdragon 778G 5G in the Galaxy A52s 5G delivers vastly superior performance compared to the Helio A25 in the Armor X9 Pro. Expect faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the A52s 5G. The A52s 5G's chipset also supports 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the Armor X9 Pro.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with an endurance rating of 113h. However, the Galaxy A52s 5G supports 25W fast charging, significantly reducing charging times compared to the Armor X9 Pro's 10W charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Ulefone Armor X9 Pro? Individuals working in demanding environments (construction, outdoor activities) or those needing a highly durable, budget-friendly phone. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G? Users seeking a well-rounded mid-range phone with a great display, fast performance, and a capable camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Ulefone Armor X9 Pro waterproof?
Yes, the Ulefone Armor X9 Pro is IP68 rated, meaning it's dustproof and waterproof up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G have a microSD card slot?
Yes, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G supports microSD card expansion up to 1TB.