Ulefone Armor X16 vs. Blackview BV9200: A Rugged Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained use and value, the Ulefone Armor X16 emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 116:54h battery endurance significantly outweighs the Blackview BV9200’s faster charging, especially considering the similar processing power. However, those who frequently need to top up quickly will appreciate the BV9200.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor X16 | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 173.8 x 83.4 x 18 mm (6.84 x 3.28 x 0.71 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 395.4 g (13.93 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~71.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 910 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G91 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared lights 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 10360 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Wasteland Shadow/Sand Dune | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 200 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 116:54h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor X16
- Exceptional battery endurance (116:54h)
- Long-lasting battery health (1000 cycles)
- Competitive price point for the features offered
- Slower charging speeds (33W wired)
- Display brightness and quality likely inferior to BV9200
Blackview BV9200
- Faster charging (66W wired, 30W wireless)
- Brighter display (481 nits)
- Slightly more powerful CPU (Helio G96)
- Lower battery endurance compared to X16
- Potentially shorter battery lifespan due to faster charging
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 boasts a significantly brighter display, measured at 481 nits, compared to the Ulefone Armor X16 (brightness data unavailable). This makes the BV9200 more usable in direct sunlight. Furthermore, the BV9200’s 1423:1 contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. While the X16’s display specs are absent, rugged phones often prioritize durability over display quality, so the BV9200 likely has a visual edge. The lack of LTPO on either device suggests standard refresh rates, focusing on power efficiency rather than fluid motion.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not detailed enough to draw significant conclusions. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups common in this price range, but without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on both devices is typical, but its utility is limited due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). Image processing algorithms will play a crucial role in differentiating the two, but without sample images, it’s impossible to determine which phone produces more pleasing results.
Performance
Both devices utilize Mediatek’s 12nm process, but differ in chipset. The Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96, with its Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, offers a slight architectural advantage over the Ulefone Armor X16’s Helio G91 and its Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. While the clock speed difference is minimal, the A76 architecture generally provides better single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. However, the six Cortex-A55 cores are identical in both, handling background tasks efficiently. Real-world performance will likely be similar for most users, with the BV9200 having a small edge in demanding scenarios.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor X16’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 116:54 hours. This is significantly longer than what’s typically seen in rugged phones. While the Blackview BV9200 doesn’t disclose endurance, it compensates with significantly faster charging: 66W wired and 30W wireless, compared to the X16’s 33W wired and 5W reverse wired. The BV9200 can likely achieve a full charge in under an hour, while the X16 will take considerably longer. The X16’s stated 1000 charge cycles also suggest a focus on long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor X16 if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, and prioritize battery life over the absolute fastest charging speeds. This is the phone for extended trips, fieldwork, or anyone who dislikes daily charging. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you prefer the convenience of 66W wired and 30W wireless charging, and value a brighter, more visible display for outdoor use, even if it means slightly less overall battery endurance.