Ulefone Armor X16 vs. Blackview BV8800: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing absolute battery longevity, the Ulefone Armor X16 is the clear winner, boasting an astounding 116:54h endurance. However, the Blackview BV8800 provides a brighter, more visually appealing display and a slightly more powerful processor, making it a better choice for media consumption and moderate gaming.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor X16 | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 173.8 x 83.4 x 18 mm (6.84 x 3.28 x 0.71 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 395.4 g (13.93 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~71.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 910 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G91 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared lights 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 10360 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Wasteland Shadow/Sand Dune | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 116:54h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor X16
- Exceptional battery life (116:54h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Processor slightly less powerful than the BV8800
- Display brightness data unavailable, potentially lower than BV8800
Blackview BV8800
- Brighter display (501 nits)
- More powerful processor (Helio G96)
- Faster charging (100% in 90 minutes)
- Significantly shorter battery life (199h endurance)
- Limited battery lifespan information
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV8800 features a display capable of reaching 501 nits of peak brightness, a significant advantage over the Ulefone Armor X16 (brightness data unavailable). Both share a 1348:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar color depth and black levels. While the BV8800’s brightness is measured, the X16’s is not, making direct comparison difficult. However, for outdoor visibility, the BV8800 will likely perform better. Panel technology details are missing for both, but given the price point, expect IPS LCDs on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. This suggests a focus on basic photography rather than high-end imaging. The absence of details makes a meaningful comparison impossible. It’s safe to assume both phones will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size.
Performance
Both phones utilize MediaTek Helio G-series chipsets, but the Blackview BV8800’s Helio G96 offers a slight edge over the Ulefone Armor X16’s Helio G91. The G96 features a Cortex-A76 core clocked at 2.05 GHz, compared to the X16’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75. While both are octa-core designs with similar Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the A76 architecture generally provides better single-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the BV8800. However, the X16’s optimized power efficiency may offset this performance difference in sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor X16 dominates in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 116:54h rating. This is a massive leap over the Blackview BV8800’s 199h. While the BV8800 charges faster, reaching 31% in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes with its 33W charging, the X16’s longevity is its primary strength. The X16 also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature present on the BV8800 as well, allowing it to top up smaller devices. The X16’s stated 1000 charge cycles suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor X16 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and your usage primarily involves communication and essential apps. This is ideal for fieldwork, travel, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you prefer a more responsive user experience, enjoy watching videos or playing games on your phone, and value a brighter, more vibrant display, even if it means sacrificing some battery life.