Ulefone Armor X12 vs. Blackview BV8800: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sheer longevity and minimal fuss, the Ulefone Armor X12’s exceptional 47:39h endurance rating is a clear winner. However, the Blackview BV8800, with its Helio G96 chipset, offers a significantly more responsive experience for multitasking and media consumption, making it the better choice for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor X12 | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, September | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 157.2 x 76.8 x 14.3 mm (6.19 x 3.02 x 0.56 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 257 g (9.07 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~63.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761V/WAB Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 (Go edition) | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.4µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4860 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Black/Orange, Black/Green | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | - | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 47:39h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor X12
- Exceptional battery life (47:39h endurance)
- 1000 charge cycles promise long-term reliability
- Focus on core functionality for extended usability
- Significantly weaker processor for demanding tasks
- Display specifications likely inferior to the BV8800
- Charging speed likely slower
Blackview BV8800
- Faster and more responsive performance with Helio G96
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- 33W fast charging with 90-minute full charge
- Significantly shorter battery life (199h endurance)
- Higher power consumption
- May experience more throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV8800 boasts a measured peak brightness of 501 nits and a 1348:1 contrast ratio, providing a more vibrant and visible display experience, particularly outdoors. While the Ulefone Armor X12’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume a lower brightness level given its focus on battery life. The identical contrast ratio suggests similar panel technology, but the BV8800’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage for usability in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the BV8800’s more powerful chipset suggests superior image processing capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on many phones in this segment is often a marketing tactic, offering limited real-world benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Blackview BV8800’s Mediatek Helio G96, an octa-core processor with a combination of Cortex-A76 and A55 cores clocked up to 2.05 GHz, represents a substantial leap in performance over the Ulefone Armor X12’s quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 processor and Helio A22 chipset. The G96’s architecture allows for faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. The A22 is geared towards efficiency, but will struggle with demanding applications. This translates to a better experience for gaming and media consumption on the BV8800.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor X12’s standout feature is its incredible 47:39h endurance rating, achieved with a battery size not specified but optimized for longevity. In contrast, the Blackview BV8800 offers a significantly lower 199h endurance. However, the BV8800 compensates with 33W wired charging, achieving 31% charge in 30 minutes and a full charge in 90 minutes. The Armor X12’s charging speed is unknown, but likely slower. The BV8800 also offers reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor X12 if you need a phone that will reliably last for days on a single charge, and your primary use case revolves around basic communication and occasional light tasks. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you prefer a smoother, more capable experience for gaming, streaming, and running multiple apps, and are willing to charge it more frequently. The BV8800 is for those who need a rugged phone that doesn't compromise on performance.