Ulefone Armor X10 vs. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: A Rugged Phone Showdown

The rugged smartphone market caters to a specific need: durability. But within that niche, price and performance vary wildly. We pit the Ulefone Armor X10, a budget-focused option, against the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, a more established and feature-rich device, to determine which offers the best blend of toughness and usability.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users needing a reliable, durable phone for demanding work, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is the superior choice. Its Exynos 9611 chipset delivers significantly better performance than the Ulefone's Helio A22, justifying the price difference for those who need multitasking and app responsiveness.

PHONES
Phone Names Ulefone Armor X10 Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 281, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
SpeedHSPA 21/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/150 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat11 600/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 20, 29, 38, 40, 41, 66 - Canada
Launch
Announced2021, December 242020, January
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, December 24Available. Released 2020, January
Body
Dimensions158.2 x 76.7 x 14.6 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.57 in)159.9 x 76.7 x 10 mm (6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight256 g (9.03 oz)218 g (7.69 oz)
 IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliantIP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~63.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~79.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUQuad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetMediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm)Exynos 9611 (10 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G72 MP3
OSAndroid 11Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal32GB 4GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1-
Main Camera
Dual13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens25 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
FeaturesDual-LED flashDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single5 MP, f/2.2-
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single5 MP, f/2.213 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radio, RDS, recordingFM radio (market/region dependent)
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/k/v/r, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
 -ANT+
Battery
Charging10W wired15W wired
TypeLi-Po 5180 mAhLi-Po 4050 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsBlack/GrayBlack
Models-SM-G715FN/DS, SM-G715FN, SM-G715F, SM-G715W, SM-G715U, SM-G715U1
PriceAbout 130 EURAbout 120 EUR
SAR EU-0.47 W/kg (head)     1.23 W/kg (body)

Ulefone Armor X10

  • Significantly lower price point
  • Rugged design for durability
  • Basic functionality for essential tasks

  • Weak processor performance
  • Slow charging speed
  • Likely limited software support

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro

  • Powerful Exynos 9611 processor
  • Faster 15W charging
  • Samsung’s software and support ecosystem

  • Higher price compared to Ulefone
  • Still a mid-range processor, not flagship-level
  • Rugged design may add bulk

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details on panel type and resolution are missing for the Ulefone, suggesting a basic LCD. The Samsung XCover Pro, while also likely LCD, benefits from Samsung’s display expertise, potentially offering better color accuracy and viewing angles. The real difference lies in processing power impacting UI smoothness, not display quality itself. Both are likely to prioritize durability over visual fidelity.

Camera Comparison

Camera details are sparse for both devices, but the XCover Pro likely holds an advantage due to Samsung’s image processing capabilities. While both may feature multiple lenses, the Ulefone’s likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for a less capable sensor. The XCover Pro’s Exynos 9611 ISP (Image Signal Processor) will deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Expect the XCover Pro to handle video recording with more stability and detail.

Performance

The performance gap is substantial. The Ulefone Armor X10’s MediaTek Helio A22, a quad-core processor built on a 12nm process, is geared towards basic tasks. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro’s Exynos 9611, an octa-core chip fabricated on a more efficient 10nm node, offers a significant leap in processing power. The Exynos’s Cortex-A73 cores provide a much faster experience for multitasking, running demanding apps, and handling complex operations. This translates to a smoother user experience and better long-term usability for the XCover Pro.

Battery Life

Battery capacity isn’t specified for the Ulefone, but rugged phones generally prioritize long battery life. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro supports 15W wired charging, a noticeable improvement over the Ulefone’s 10W charging. While a larger battery capacity doesn’t guarantee longer runtime (efficiency matters), the faster charging on the XCover Pro minimizes downtime, crucial for users relying on their phone throughout the day. The Exynos 9611’s 10nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.

Buying Guide

Buy the Ulefone Armor X10 if you need an extremely affordable, basic rugged phone for occasional use or as a backup device where performance isn't critical. It's ideal for situations where the phone might be dropped or exposed to harsh conditions, but you don't require demanding applications. Buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro if you prioritize performance, a more refined user experience, and features like faster charging and a more capable processor for running work-related apps, navigation, and communication tools reliably.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Exynos 9611 in the Galaxy XCover Pro prone to overheating during prolonged use?
While not a flagship chip, the Exynos 9611 is generally well-managed in the XCover Pro. The 10nm process and Samsung’s thermal design prevent significant overheating during typical use, including navigation, communication, and moderate app usage. However, extended gaming sessions or demanding tasks may lead to some warmth.
❓ How effective is the ruggedization on the Ulefone Armor X10 compared to the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro?
Both phones are built to withstand drops and harsh environments. However, the XCover Pro benefits from Samsung’s quality control and certification standards (MIL-STD-810H). While the Ulefone likely meets basic ruggedness requirements, the XCover Pro offers a more robust and reliable level of protection, particularly against water and dust ingress.
❓ Can the Ulefone Armor X10 handle basic work apps like email, messaging, and a simple task manager?
Yes, the Ulefone Armor X10 can handle basic work apps, but expect slower loading times and potential lag when multitasking. The Helio A22 processor is sufficient for these core functions, but it will struggle with more demanding applications or running multiple apps simultaneously.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro support NFC for mobile payments?
Yes, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro does support NFC, allowing for contactless payments and other NFC-enabled features. This is a valuable addition for users who rely on mobile payment solutions in the field.