Ulefone Armor X10 Pro vs Cat S62: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Cat S62 wins overall, offering a significantly faster processor, wireless charging, and QC4 fast charging. While the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro is a more affordable option, the Cat S62's superior performance and features justify its higher price for users needing a truly robust and capable device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor X10 Pro | Cat S62 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 21/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 10 | 2021, June 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 10 | Available. Released 2021, June 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 76.7 x 14.6 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.57 in) | 157.5 x 76.2 x 12.7 mm (6.20 x 3.00 x 0.5 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 256 g (9.03 oz) | 260 g (9.17 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~63.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 20 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.78", 1.0µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | Wireless QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 5180 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black/Gray | Black |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Ulefone Armor X10 Pro
- Highly Affordable
- Rugged and Durable Design
- Decent Battery Life
- IP68/IP69K Water & Dust Resistance
- Slow Processor
- Slow Charging (10W)
- Lower Camera Quality
- Limited Software Updates
Cat S62
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 660)
- Wireless Charging
- QC4 Fast Charging
- Better Camera
- Potentially Thermal Imaging (model dependent)
- More Responsive User Experience
- Higher Price
- Can be bulky
- Software updates can be slow
Display Comparison
Both phones feature durable displays, likely with Gorilla Glass protection, though specifics are often limited in rugged phone marketing. The Cat S62 likely has a slightly brighter and more color-accurate display due to its higher-tier chipset and potentially better panel technology. Resolution is likely similar, around 720p or 1080p.
Camera Comparison
The Cat S62 generally boasts a better camera system, likely with improved image processing and potentially more advanced features. While both phones offer decent image quality in good lighting, the Cat S62 will likely perform better in low-light conditions. Specific megapixel counts are often secondary to image processing capabilities in rugged phones.
Performance
The Cat S62's Snapdragon 660 offers a substantial performance advantage over the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro's Helio P22. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the Cat S62. Gaming performance will also be noticeably better.
Battery Life
Both phones are designed for extended battery life. The Cat S62's more efficient Snapdragon chipset and support for QC4 fast charging give it an edge in overall battery performance and charging speed. The Ulefone Armor X10 Pro's 10W charging is considerably slower.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Armor X10 Pro is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability and basic ruggedness. The Cat S62 is perfect for professionals and outdoor enthusiasts who demand high performance, fast charging, and advanced features like wireless charging and potentially thermal imaging (depending on the specific model).