Ulefone has carved a niche for affordable tablets, and the Armor Pad and Tab A8 are two popular contenders. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Armor Pad takes the crown thanks to its significantly longer battery life (83.38h vs. unknown for Tab A8), faster charging (18W vs 10W), and slightly more powerful CPU configuration. While both are budget-friendly, the Armor Pad offers a more robust and feature-rich experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 22 | 2023, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 22 | Available. Released 2023, January 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 213 x 128.8 x 14 mm (8.39 x 5.07 x 0.55 in) | 238.7 x 157.5 x 7.4 mm (9.40 x 6.20 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 560 g (1.23 lb) | 483 g (1.06 lb) |
| | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m
MIL-STD-810H compliant
Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~67.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio G25 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762V/WD (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W Wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 7650 mAh, removable | Li-Po 6580 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Gray |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 83:38h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class F | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor Pad
- Exceptional battery life
- Faster charging (18W)
- Slightly more powerful CPU
- Rugged design (implied)
- Potentially better display
- Entry-level chipset performance
- Camera quality likely basic
- May be slightly more expensive than Tab A8
Ulefone Tab A8
- Budget-friendly
- Adequate for basic tasks
- Lightweight and portable
- Unknown battery life
- Slow charging (10W)
- Less powerful CPU
- Likely lower display quality
- No ruggedization
Display Comparison
Both tablets likely feature similar 10-inch displays with standard resolutions (likely 1280x800). The Armor Pad *might* have slightly better brightness or color accuracy, but detailed specifications are unavailable. Expect adequate viewing experiences for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are generally lacking for both devices. Expect basic, low-resolution cameras suitable for occasional video calls or quick snapshots. Image quality won't be a strong point for either tablet.
Performance
The Armor Pad's Helio G25 has a slightly more complex CPU configuration (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) compared to the Tab A8's single 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 octa-core. This suggests a potential edge in multitasking and handling slightly more demanding apps on the Armor Pad. However, both are entry-level chipsets, so don't expect flagship performance.
Battery Life
This is where the Armor Pad truly shines. Its advertised 83.38-hour endurance is exceptional. The Tab A8's battery capacity is unknown, but the 10W charging speed suggests a smaller capacity and slower charging times.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Armor Pad is ideal for users prioritizing battery life, durability (implied by 'Armor' branding), and slightly better performance. The Ulefone Tab A8 is a good choice for those on a very tight budget who need a basic tablet for light tasks like browsing and media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Ulefone Armor Pad waterproof?
While the name suggests durability, specific waterproof ratings are typically not provided for Ulefone tablets. It's likely more resistant to splashes and minor drops than the Tab A8, but submersion is not recommended.
❓ Can I play demanding games on either of these tablets?
Neither tablet is designed for high-end gaming. They can handle basic games and casual titles, but graphically intensive games will likely suffer from low frame rates and lag.
