Ulefone Armor Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Tab Active3: Which Rugged Tablet Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active3 offers superior performance and a more polished software experience thanks to its more powerful chipset. However, the Ulefone Armor Pad boasts incredible battery endurance and a potentially lower price point, making it a compelling option for users prioritizing longevity and budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor Pad | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 22 | 2020, September 28. Released 2020, September 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 22 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 213 x 128.8 x 14 mm (8.39 x 5.07 x 0.55 in) | 213.8 x 126.8 x 9.9 mm (8.42 x 4.99 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 560 g (1.23 lb) | 426 g (Wi-Fi) / 429 g (LTE) (15.03 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | Stylus IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~283 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~67.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~68.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Mongoose M3 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio G25 (12 nm) | Exynos 9810 (10 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G72 MP18 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF | 13 MP, f/1.9, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (EMV Level 1 certification) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.1, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Samsung DeX (desktop experience support) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W Wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 7650 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 5050 mAh, removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | - | SM-T575 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 83:38h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class F | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor Pad
- Exceptional battery life (claimed 83:38h)
- Extremely durable and rugged design
- Potentially lower price point
- High cycle count (1000)
- Lower performance compared to Active3
- Less refined software experience
- Likely inferior display quality
- Camera likely not as good
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active3
- Superior performance thanks to Exynos 9810
- Brighter and more accurate display
- Better camera system
- More polished Android experience
- Enterprise features and support
- Shorter battery life compared to Armor Pad
- Higher price point
- Charging speed is relatively slow (15W)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active3 features a brighter and more color-accurate display, typically around 8 inches with a resolution of 1920x1200. The Ulefone Armor Pad's display is likely to be similar in size and resolution, but potentially with lower brightness and color accuracy. Samsung's display generally provides a better viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While both tablets have cameras, the Samsung Galaxy Tab Active3 is expected to have a better camera system overall, likely with higher resolution and improved image processing. The Ulefone Armor Pad's camera is likely adequate for basic snapshots but won't compete with the Active3's capabilities.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active3's Exynos 9810 chipset significantly outperforms the Ulefone Armor Pad's Helio G25. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Active3. The Active3's Mongoose cores provide a noticeable speed boost.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor Pad's claim of 83:38h endurance and 1000 cycles is a major selling point, suggesting exceptional battery life and longevity. The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active3, while having a decent battery, won't match the Armor Pad's claimed endurance. This is a key differentiator.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Armor Pad is ideal for users needing extreme battery life and a budget-friendly rugged tablet for basic tasks. The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active3 is better suited for professionals requiring robust performance, enterprise features, and a more refined Android experience.