Ulefone Armor Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2: Which Rugged Tablet Reigns Supreme?

Need a tablet that can withstand drops, dust, and water? The Ulefone Armor Pad and Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 are both built tough, but which one offers the best overall experience? We're diving deep into a head-to-head comparison to help you decide.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 edges out the Ulefone Armor Pad thanks to its more refined software, slightly better performance, and established brand reputation. However, the Armor Pad boasts incredible battery life and a potentially lower price point, making it a compelling option for budget-conscious users prioritizing endurance.

PHONES
Phone Names Ulefone Armor Pad Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2023, March 222017, October
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, March 22Available. Released 2017, November
Body
Dimensions213 x 128.8 x 14 mm (8.39 x 5.07 x 0.55 in)127.6 x 214.7 x 9.9 mm (5.02 x 8.45 x 0.39 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM
Weight560 g (1.23 lb)415 g (Wi-Fi) / 419 g (LTE) (14.64 oz)
 IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope)Stylus IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions
Display
ProtectionMohs level 4-
Resolution800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density)800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density)
Size8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~67.6% screen-to-body ratio)8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~67.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDLCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A53
ChipsetMediatek MT6762 Helio G25 (12 nm)Exynos 7870 Octa (14 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-T830 MP1
OSAndroid 12Android 7.1.1 (Nougat)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM16GB 3GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single13 MP, f/2.2, AF8 MP, AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP, f/2.05 MP
VideoYes-
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYes-
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS
RadioWireless FM radio, RDS, recordingNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connectorUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
 -ANT+
Battery
Charging18W Wired-
TypeLi-Po 7650 mAh, removableLi-Ion 4450 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsBlackBlack
Models-SM-T395
PriceAbout 200 EURAbout 390 EUR
EU LABEL
Battery83:38h endurance, 1000 cycles-
EnergyClass F-
Free fallClass A (270 falls)-
RepairabilityClass C-

Ulefone Armor Pad

  • Exceptional battery life
  • Very durable build
  • Potentially lower price
  • Large screen size

  • Less powerful processor
  • Less refined software
  • Unknown camera quality
  • Brand reputation less established

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2

  • Better performance
  • More polished Android experience
  • Samsung's Knox security
  • Established brand reputation

  • Shorter battery life
  • Higher price
  • Older chipset

Display Comparison

Both tablets feature durable displays, likely with some level of scratch resistance. The Galaxy Tab Active 2 likely has a slightly better screen quality due to Samsung's display technology, but both prioritize durability over premium visuals. Expect resolutions around 1280 x 800.

Camera Comparison

Camera quality is unlikely to be a primary concern for rugged tablet users. Both devices will likely have basic cameras suitable for quick snapshots, but don't expect flagship-level performance. The Galaxy Tab Active 2 might have a slight edge in image processing.

Performance

The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2's Exynos 7870, while older, benefits from Samsung's optimization and generally offers smoother performance than the Ulefone Armor Pad's Helio G25. Expect slightly faster app loading and multitasking on the Active 2. The Armor Pad's CPU is adequate for basic tasks.

Battery Life

The Ulefone Armor Pad's claim of 83:38h endurance and 1000 cycles is a *major* selling point. This significantly surpasses the Galaxy Tab Active 2's battery life, making the Armor Pad a clear winner for users prioritizing longevity.

Buying Guide

The Ulefone Armor Pad is ideal for users needing extreme battery life and a very affordable rugged tablet, particularly those in fields like construction or outdoor work. The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 is better suited for professionals requiring a more polished Android experience, reliable performance, and Samsung's ecosystem integration, such as Knox security.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Ulefone Armor Pad waterproof?
Yes, the Ulefone Armor Pad is designed to be waterproof and dustproof, typically with an IP68 or IP69K rating. Check the specific model's documentation for exact details.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 have a stylus?
Yes, the Galaxy Tab Active 2 supports a stylus (sold separately) for enhanced input and navigation.
❓ Which tablet is better for gaming?
The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 is better suited for light gaming due to its slightly more powerful processor. However, neither tablet is designed for demanding games.
❓ What is Knox security?
Knox is Samsung's security platform that provides hardware and software-level protection for mobile devices, making it ideal for enterprise use.