Looking for a durable tablet or a reliable everyday device? The Ulefone Armor Pad promises ruggedness, while the Nokia T10 focuses on dependability. This comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and features to help you decide which tablet is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Armor Pad takes the crown for durability and battery endurance, boasting an incredible 83 hours and 1000 cycles. However, the Nokia T10 offers a slightly more modern chipset and potentially smoother performance for everyday tasks. It depends on your priorities: ruggedness or responsiveness.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 22 | 2022, July 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 22 | Available. Released 2022, August 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 213 x 128.8 x 14 mm (8.39 x 5.07 x 0.55 in) | 208 x 123.2 x 9 mm (8.19 x 4.85 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 560 g (1.23 lb) | 375 g (13.23 oz) |
| | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m
MIL-STD-810H compliant
Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~67.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 360 nits (typ), 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio G25 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF | 8 MP, 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 2 MP, 1/5.0", 1.65µm |
| Video | Yes | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W Wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 7650 mAh, removable | Li-Po 5250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Ocean Blue |
| Models | - | TA-1503, TA-1472, TA-1462, TA-1457 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 83:38h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class F | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor Pad
- Exceptional battery life (83h)
- Incredible charge cycle endurance (1000)
- Rugged and durable design
- Water and dust resistant
- Lower performance chipset
- Basic display quality
- Potentially slower software updates
Nokia T10
- Slightly better performance
- More modern chipset
- Reliable brand reputation
- Decent display quality
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Slower charging (10W)
- Less rugged than Armor Pad
Display Comparison
Both tablets feature 10.1-inch displays, but the Nokia T10 likely has better color accuracy and brightness due to its IPS panel. The Armor Pad's display is likely more basic, prioritizing durability over visual fidelity. Resolution is likely 1280x800 on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is unlikely to be a strong point on either device. Expect basic cameras suitable for video calls, but not high-quality photography. The Nokia T10 might have a slight advantage due to potentially better software processing.
Performance
The Nokia T10's Unisoc T606 chipset, with its Cortex-A75 cores, offers a performance edge over the Ulefone Armor Pad's Helio G25. Expect smoother multitasking and app loading on the Nokia T10, though both are budget-oriented.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor Pad's battery life is its standout feature, with an astonishing 83 hours of endurance and 1000 charge cycles. The Nokia T10's battery is respectable, but significantly less impressive in comparison.
Buying Guide
The Ulefone Armor Pad is ideal for outdoor enthusiasts, construction workers, or anyone needing a tablet that can withstand harsh conditions. The Nokia T10 is a great choice for students, families, or those seeking a dependable tablet for browsing, streaming, and light productivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Ulefone Armor Pad waterproof?
Yes, the Ulefone Armor Pad is designed to be water and dust resistant, typically with an IP68 or IP69K rating, though specific details should be confirmed on the product page.
❓ Can the Nokia T10 handle gaming?
The Nokia T10 can handle casual games, but its chipset isn't powerful enough for demanding titles. Expect lower frame rates and potentially graphical settings.
