Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra vs. Doogee T20 Ultra: A Rugged Tablet Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7400X chipset delivers significantly more processing power, and the 120W charging is a game-changer. While the Doogee T20 Ultra offers a more budget-friendly entry point, it compromises heavily on speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra | Doogee T20 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October | 2023, October |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 11 | Available. Released 2023, November |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 269.7 x 179.5 x 27.8 mm (10.62 x 7.07 x 1.09 in) | 278.8 x 174.3 x 7.6 mm (10.98 x 6.86 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 1600 g (3.53 lb) | 568 g (1.25 lb) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~194 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~72.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.0 inches, 409.9 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 600 nits | IPS LCD, 350 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 16 MP |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic accessory connector pins |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired 10W reverse wired | 18W wired Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 24200 mAh | 10800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Blue, Gray, Black |
| Price | About 700 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 401:34h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class D (85 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7400X)
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Longer battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Likely higher price point
- Potential for increased heat under sustained load (though 4nm helps)
Doogee T20 Ultra
- More affordable price
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Rugged design
- Slow 18W charging
- Less powerful processor (Helio G99)
- Potential for throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
While both tablets are likely to feature durable, scratch-resistant displays (specifications not provided), the core difference lies beneath the surface. The Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra’s Dimensity 7400X chipset will drive a smoother user experience, especially when paired with a higher resolution or refresh rate panel (assumed, based on price point). The Doogee T20 Ultra’s Helio G99, while capable, will struggle with graphically intensive applications. The impact of panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming) is unknown without further specs, but is a key differentiator for eye comfort.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra will have a more capable image signal processor (ISP), leading to better image quality and faster processing. The Doogee T20 Ultra’s Helio G99 is known for decent image processing, but it won’t match the sophistication of the Dimensity 7400X. We anticipate the Ulefone will handle low-light photography and video recording with greater fidelity. Any 2MP macro lenses on either device should be considered marketing filler.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4nm) is a substantial leap ahead of the Doogee T20 Ultra’s Helio G99 (6nm). The Dimensity 7400X utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the G99’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to approximately 20-30% faster CPU performance in benchmarks, and a significantly more powerful GPU. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7400X also offers superior thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during prolonged use. The Doogee T20 Ultra will be adequate for everyday tasks, but will exhibit noticeable slowdowns with multitasking or demanding games.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra boasts a 401-hour endurance rating and supports 120W wired charging, a massive advantage over the Doogee T20 Ultra’s 18W charging. While the exact battery capacity isn’t specified, the 120W charging allows for a full charge in under 30 minutes, minimizing downtime. The Ulefone also claims 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan. The Doogee T20 Ultra will likely offer acceptable battery life for moderate use, but the slower charging speed will be a significant inconvenience for power users. The Ulefone’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra if you need a tablet capable of handling demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or running complex simulations in the field. Its superior processing power and fast charging are ideal for professionals and power users. Buy the Doogee T20 Ultra if you prioritize affordability and basic tablet functionality for light tasks like media consumption, web browsing, and simple productivity apps, and aren't concerned with sustained high performance.