Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra vs. Blackview Tab 16 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users demanding raw performance and rapid recharging, the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7400X chipset offers a significant performance advantage. However, the Blackview Tab 16 Pro excels in battery endurance and offers a more budget-friendly option for casual users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra | Blackview Tab 16 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October | 2024, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 11 | Available. Released 2024, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 269.7 x 179.5 x 27.8 mm (10.62 x 7.07 x 1.09 in) | 256.8 x 167 x 7.5 mm (10.11 x 6.57 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 1600 g (3.53 lb) | 503 g (1.11 lb) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 4 | Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~72.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 600 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 0.7µm, 4 infrared lights | 13 MP 2 MP |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.8µm | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired 10W reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 24200 mAh | 7700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Gray, Blue, Violet |
| Price | About 700 EUR | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 401:34h endurance, 1000 cycles | 97:36h endurance, 1200 cycles |
| Energy | Class D | Class E |
| Free fall | Class D (85 falls) | Class B (156 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class B |
Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra
- Significantly faster processor for demanding tasks
- Ultra-fast 120W charging for minimal downtime
- Potentially higher-quality display and camera system
- Shorter battery endurance compared to the Blackview
- Likely a higher price point
Blackview Tab 16 Pro
- Exceptional battery life for extended use
- More affordable price point
- Higher battery cycle count for long-term reliability
- Slower processor struggles with demanding applications
- Slow 18W charging takes significantly longer
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing, the target market suggests both tablets will likely feature IPS LCD panels. However, the performance gap in the chipset suggests the Ulefone may be paired with a higher-quality panel, potentially with a higher refresh rate. The Blackview, aiming for affordability, will likely prioritize cost-effectiveness over display fidelity. Bezels are likely comparable given the similar form factors.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price and positioning, the Ulefone is likely to feature a more capable camera system. The focus should be on the main sensor resolution and aperture. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Ulefone would be a significant advantage. The Blackview will likely rely on software processing to enhance image quality, but will be limited by its less powerful ISP.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400X (4nm) chipset represents a substantial leap in performance over the Blackview Tab 16 Pro’s Unisoc Tiger T616 (12nm). The Dimensity 7400X utilizes newer Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the T616’s older Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to significantly faster CPU performance, particularly in multi-threaded workloads. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7400X also offers superior power efficiency, mitigating potential thermal throttling during sustained use. The T616 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra boasts a 401:34h endurance rating, while the Blackview Tab 16 Pro achieves 97:36h. This difference is substantial, but must be considered alongside charging speeds. The Ulefone’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time compared to the Blackview’s 18W charging. The Blackview’s 1200 battery cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health, while the Ulefone’s 1000 cycles are still respectable. The Ulefone’s faster charging effectively mitigates the lower endurance rating for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra if you need a tablet for demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, or running professional applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging. Buy the Blackview Tab 16 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life for media consumption, reading, or light productivity, and are looking for a more affordable tablet solution.